Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pam Geller's little hate group defended these ads 47of74 Sep 2012 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #2
well heaven05 Sep 2012 #3
Actually many laughed at your concern troll posts ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #15
So if we are not on your concern troll bandwagon we support Geller? ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #29
Fortunately a minority here on DU support your platform of banning speech we don't like ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #31
Defended? That group paid for the ads and had to sue to get them posted. ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #8
Defended? no they originated these ads check out the bottom of the ad azurnoir Sep 2012 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #18
What if you changed the word savage and said Muslim? oberliner Sep 2012 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #22
Sounds like it won't oberliner Sep 2012 #30
So what? Do bigots NOT have first amendment rights too? alp227 Sep 2012 #34
Not sure this will pass muster by the Courts brooklynite Sep 2012 #4
Exactly! Racial violence has existed long before talk radio, fox news, and rw blogs. alp227 Sep 2012 #38
The ads are, no doubt, horrible. JDPriestly Sep 2012 #5
plus a million. scares me that people want to censor due to whos the most violent. loli phabay Sep 2012 #6
Those that would surrender to the Hecklers Veto is always a concern to those who value free speech ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #10
its not just free speech its all freedoms that are put on the table once you start loli phabay Sep 2012 #12
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #16
So those who support constitutional freedom of expression ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #27
I support free speech for all ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #33
so you do not consider Jihad Watch and atlas shrugs to be hate groups? n/t azurnoir Sep 2012 #14
bullshit The taxes I pay to fund the MTA should not be used to promote hate speech erodriguez Sep 2012 #7
Paid ads are a money maker for the MTA...this one maybe not so much ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #17
Your poutrage does not change the facts ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #28
No substantive response so you degenerate to ad hominems ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #32
You are using the same argument by conservatives alp227 Sep 2012 #37
Those signs are in poor taste Stewland Sep 2012 #19
MTA was forced by the court to run them ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #25
Those policies might violate the first amendment, right? alp227 Sep 2012 #35
Don't know ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #36
Objectity Stewland Sep 2012 #20
Seems a clear case of yelling "fire" in a crowded theater which is prohibited free speech. Kablooie Sep 2012 #39
These are not 'pro-Israel' ads; these are Islamophobic ads LeftishBrit Sep 2012 #40
So any religion or group that doesn't want to be insulted needs to riot and get violent. Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #41
So Geller's ads go up, but the inevitable reaction ads will not.... Junkdrawer Sep 2012 #42
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»M.T.A. Amends Rules After...»Reply #7