Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moriah

(8,312 posts)
30. Oh, the ones shoving against cops and yelling in their faces were.
Tue May 5, 2020, 04:48 PM
May 2020

However, had they started to arrest any of them for their various crimes, it would have gotten out of hand.

Just a few:

Disturbance of lawful meetings—Any person who shall make or excite any disturbance or contention in any tavern, store or grocery, manufacturing establishment or any other business place or in any street, lane, alley, highway, public building, grounds or park, or at any election or other public meeting where citizens are peaceably and lawfully assembled, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

Clearly they were causing a disturbance to the legislators who were lawfully assembling.

Resisting/obstructing an officer-- Assault, batter, wound, obstruct, or endanger an officer enforcing an ordinance, law, rule, order, or resolution of the common council of a city board of trustees, the common council or village council of an incorporated village, or a township board of a township. "Obstruct" includes the use or threatened use of physical interference or force or a knowing failure to comply with a lawful command. A person who violates this section is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 2 years or a fine of not more than $2,000.00, or both.

Clearly those who were shoving against officers to get on the floor were guilty of this crime.

------

I understand why police are reticent to do mass arrests regarding these protests.

It isn't even necessarily the thought that they'd shoot vs be arrested. To be honest, veteran protesters treat their arrests as honorable stories -- they'd be all for getting arrested, like that anti-vaccine protester demanded to be arrested. They'd want the notoriety.

It's that trying to get all of them processed and given their court dates would overwhelm a local jail system AND potentially expose staff and inmates to COVID-19 unnecessarily.

I just hope people don't start getting the idea that this is proper behavior.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They are banned at the federal buildings arent they? Fullduplexxx May 2020 #1
I believe they are. And courthouses across the country. BComplex May 2020 #7
Gee, ya think? ChiTownDenny May 2020 #2
I'm gonna guess a new law banning guns will only apply to non-whites... FailureToCommunicate May 2020 #3
I'm going to guess you're wrong because a law like that wouldn't withstand any kind of scrutiny, HeartachesNhangovers May 2020 #26
I'm gonna guess you didn't read the article. It's about banning guns (in the building) FailureToCommunicate May 2020 #29
No kidding. The article doesn't say that a possible law banning guns would only apply to HeartachesNhangovers May 2020 #31
My suggestion that gun laws are less likely to be enforced on whites is "nonsense"?? FailureToCommunicate May 2020 #33
Really? They are 'considering' a move solara May 2020 #4
Simply ban using guns as intimidation at a rally. cstanleytech May 2020 #5
Right. That's when it ceased being a peaceful protest. docgee May 2020 #19
It's not a political protest when guns are carried DBoon May 2020 #25
Metal detectors at Tarrant & Johnson County's courthouse last time was there. rickyhall May 2020 #6
So..... they allow them now? Bayard May 2020 #8
Yes, it is legal now sarisataka May 2020 #16
Oh, the ones shoving against cops and yelling in their faces were. moriah May 2020 #30
REALLY, I wonder why packman May 2020 #9
Always with Republicans: horses and barn doors. sinkingfeeling May 2020 #10
They're CONSIDERING it? moonseller66 May 2020 #11
Republicans control the MI legislature so if it passes they are voting against their base. LonePirate May 2020 #12
Ummmmm...why should legislators be more safe than the rest of us? Yeehah May 2020 #13
Catch-22 sarisataka May 2020 #18
GOP controls the legislature greenjar_01 May 2020 #14
They need to ban weapons from public places including long and short arms with no exceptions Ford_Prefect May 2020 #15
Good. People packing guns shouldn't be allowed in public buildings. The Michigan protesters should iluvtennis May 2020 #17
Remember my First Rule of Politics jmowreader May 2020 #20
good on them, but thos yahoos should have been busted in the first place for bringing their weapons AllaN01Bear May 2020 #21
You can bet if a group of heavily armed black people show up they pass it PDQ... Historic NY May 2020 #22
Unfortunately for us, the legislature is full of their own special group of MAGATs... llmart May 2020 #23
Sounds like a smart move. - n/t Jim__ May 2020 #24
Of course that restriction is being considered. Politicians wouldn't have allowed HeartachesNhangovers May 2020 #27
Allowing them in the first place was incredibly stupid Marrah_Goodman May 2020 #28
There should be a national ban on weapons in government buildings. No exceptions. Initech May 2020 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Michigan is considering m...»Reply #30