Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zing Zing Zingbah

(6,496 posts)
33. OK, another reason for people to not get tested in the first place
Thu May 7, 2020, 06:24 PM
May 2020

I don't understand why they would exclude someone with a positive COVID-19 test. If they got over it and are healthy now, that is all that should matter.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Soooooo, does this mean companies should not rehire those who have had Covid-19? Frustratedlady May 2020 #1
The military does not want to be responsible for the future health iemitsu May 2020 #3
Thank you rpannier May 2020 #13
Cause we have no Corgigal May 2020 #15
so why would any business wnat to be responsible for the future health Voltaire2 May 2020 #17
Welp, there's 100's of 1000's of people who will make sure they (or their kids) never get tested ... mr_lebowski May 2020 #2
They would not be immediately dismissed from service rpannier May 2020 #5
If this new rule really is that you are permanently disallowed from joining due to a mr_lebowski May 2020 #9
Several reasons for keeping them in rpannier May 2020 #11
Fair enuf ... thx ... & I suppose then what they are essentially doing here is admitting mr_lebowski May 2020 #16
They Aren't Admitting Anything RobinA May 2020 #27
If what the person I'm responding to is right about the reasoning mr_lebowski May 2020 #28
Honoring An Existing Contract vs Avoiding Committing The Service To A New Contract smb May 2020 #20
I guess it's better than claiming "bone spurs". PaulRevere08 May 2020 #21
So are they discharging all the sailors who got sick? caraher May 2020 #4
Not necessarily rpannier May 2020 #6
That makes absolutely no sense. I predict a "clarification" to that memo. nt SunSeeker May 2020 #7
I agree 100% Steelrolled May 2020 #30
So what will they do if most in the Military yuiyoshida May 2020 #8
No they won't fire them rpannier May 2020 #12
So much for "let it wash over us" Grokenstein May 2020 #10
When there's a vaccine, they will let them in LeftInTX May 2020 #14
So, if we go with the 'herd immunity' plan, we won't have anybody sinkingfeeling May 2020 #18
That doesn't make sense. You would think immunity would be an asset not a liability. Vinca May 2020 #19
In the Lunatic-in-Chief's peanut brain, survivors are Backseat Driver May 2020 #22
So a 1 year old child who tested positive & suffered no ill effects... CaptainTruth May 2020 #23
Well, assuming we still have a society 17 years from now... Initech May 2020 #32
By the time covid19 is done, a large percentage of the population will have had it. patphil May 2020 #24
West Point is where the "circle game" is all the rage, right? n/t captain jack May 2020 #25
If they start a draft for a war, miraculously this restriction would just disappear. roamer65 May 2020 #26
Insurance companies are going to use this rule majdrfrtim May 2020 #29
So there is an upside! n/t captain jack May 2020 #31
OK, another reason for people to not get tested in the first place Zing Zing Zingbah May 2020 #33
Sounds like preexisting conditions marlakay May 2020 #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Coronavirus Survivors 'Pe...»Reply #33