Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
"distract a president or frustrate the carrying out of his official duties"? S.e.r.i.o.u.s.l.y. flibbitygiblets May 2020 #1
The House lawyers could have used your help today.....Excellent Reply KS Toronado May 2020 #18
Well stated! NoRoadUntravelled May 2020 #27
Hope the Dems' atty replied that in Jones v Clinton DeminPennswoods May 2020 #30
"Supreme Court justices...appeared divided." Grins May 2020 #2
Please stop mahina May 2020 #8
Checks and balances? ArizonaLib May 2020 #3
THIS is why I'm critical of Joe Biden ads. When you play softball against people hurtling IED's, BComplex May 2020 #4
Biden open to a Repub VP PNW-Dem May 2020 #15
I'm also deeply concerned (Susan Collins) that he would consider a Rethug. They are not the answer. Evolve Dammit May 2020 #17
Seriously? I hadn't heard that. Does he WANT to lose? LastLiberal in PalmSprings May 2020 #26
That's a disturbing thought with the VP being just a heartbeat away from the Presidency. NoRoadUntravelled May 2020 #29
What?! Link please. KPN May 2020 #32
Biden says he's open to a Republican running mate PNW-Dem May 2020 #38
I hear Sarah Palin is available... Grins May 2020 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author mac56 May 2020 #22
What's the argument? To do or not do our jobs? n/t TheFourthMind May 2020 #5
Former US Solicitor General Neal Katyl and George Conway Argue it was a Bad Day for Trump Stallion May 2020 #6
A lawful subpoena is not harrassment, it's the only remedy when a president stonewalls and sop May 2020 #7
Various Twitter accounts mahatmakanejeeves May 2020 #9
From the post: Trump's lawyers just made appalling arguments to the Supreme Court StClone May 2020 #34
Agree. Trump is going to get off really easy on the house subpoena. Manhattan might be a little BComplex May 2020 #36
Doesn't sound too promising for Congressional oversight. Joinfortmill May 2020 #10
Congressional oversight took a bad hit yesterday. BComplex May 2020 #37
"His presidential duties"?? Scarsdale May 2020 #11
Trump has lost the next election. SkatmanRoth May 2020 #12
Both the NY IRS and federal IRS have had his tax records and financial records for decades. former9thward May 2020 #23
Because he followed IRS law, but he is not telling us about his Russian connections SkatmanRoth May 2020 #24
HEY... if the rule of law is out for an office holder, it is out for the rest of us too NotHardly May 2020 #13
We need Joe Biden to replace these justices with justices, not political appointees. ffr May 2020 #14
And how would he do that? KPN May 2020 #33
Sure, if they retire Polybius May 2020 #35
Any attempt to use claims of harassment regardless of their merits are immaterial as cstanleytech May 2020 #16
No tax records, no emoluments clause bucolic_frolic May 2020 #19
They're so concerned about "improper harassment" of a president.... lastlib May 2020 #20
Who determines if something is "improper harassment"? That's right -- Herr Trump! LastLiberal in PalmSprings May 2020 #31
It is really discouraging to see just how political the Supreme Court is Hulk May 2020 #21
Only Looking At Political Aspects Of Subpoena DallasNE May 2020 #25
Seems to me that fighting a subpoena all the way to the Supreme Court NYC Liberal May 2020 #28
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Divided U.S. Supreme Cour...»Reply #18