Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
32. What on earth are you talking about?
Fri May 15, 2020, 05:04 PM
May 2020

It was within the average range in January - that grey band. There was nothing unusual going on.

And, no, it doesn't stick around for a few months and THEN somehow launch into exponential growth.

This is a common right-wing talking point to suggest that immunity may be much higher than it probably is.

https://slate.com/technology/2020/04/coronavirus-circulating-california-2019-bunk.html

No, You Did Not Get COVID-19 in the Fall of 2019

The piece has spread widely. An accompanying web story posted to the TV station’s website has been shared more than 58,300 times, and has also been picked up by SFGate. The theory is appealing to some, particularly those who had respiratory illnesses in late 2019 that they now believe could’ve been COVID-19. In their minds, that might mean they have some immunity to the virus—and if a large portion of Americans have some immunity, we can begin our move out of lockdown. But that theory has no scientific basis, and it spreads dangerous misinformation.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/03/26/coronavirus-fact-check-could-your-december-cough-have-been-covid-19/2899027001/

Dr. Josh Petrie, assistant research professor at the University of Michigan School of Public Health, said it's important to remember that multiple existing viruses can cause severe upper respiratory symptoms and circulated late last year. Among them was Influenza B, which grew in intensity around November and December, as well as RSV and Influenza A.

He said it's possible there were "sporadic" travel-related cases earlier than the discovery of the first case but agreed it was likely not widespread as far back as November or December.


"There's a lot of surveillance that goes on for influenza every year, and so if we were seeing a lot of coronavirus activity at that time – even if you couldn't test for it – you would see signals in that influenza surveillance," he said.



----
But, yeah, those scientists are nothing compared to people sharing anecdotes on social media.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Definitely not "ironclad proof" FBaggins May 2020 #1
Just a note/mental exercise in my mind... SWBTATTReg May 2020 #2
No, not proof. However, there was also no "proof" of a January first case date. pnwmom May 2020 #19
well stated. and hits all the important points. stopdiggin May 2020 #25
Exactly. Probably MORE likely they had the flu in December Drahthaardogs May 2020 #31
It's unreal how persistent this belief is jberryhill May 2020 #33
I am a mathematical person. I think logically. Drahthaardogs May 2020 #34
So could the virus have been here for months and what's causing the deaths cstanleytech May 2020 #3
I was sick Thanksgiving last year. Tested neg. for the flu, but damn sure felt like it. Lochloosa May 2020 #4
See, this is exactly what I mean. Mike 03 May 2020 #6
There's always a variety of stuff circulating, though jberryhill May 2020 #7
Good point. Mike 03 May 2020 #8
"Could it have become deadly recently?" jberryhill May 2020 #13
Chinese researchers have found there are two strains, one deadlier than the other... AntiFascist May 2020 #40
No. Igel May 2020 #14
Were those 6 hours at a Holiday Inn Express? If so you're good, obviously (nt) mr_lebowski May 2020 #15
How do we know the deaths weren't there? We don't generally do autopsies on pnwmom May 2020 #20
Excess mortality jberryhill May 2020 #21
Try this one jberryhill May 2020 #23
Why are you showing graphs of Europe instead of the United States? pnwmom May 2020 #24
Because they were handy jberryhill May 2020 #26
Here jberryhill May 2020 #27
Your graph proves my point, thanks. There were excess deaths in January pnwmom May 2020 #28
What on earth are you talking about? jberryhill May 2020 #32
With exponential growth the initial numbers are very small. And then suddenly they aren't. pnwmom May 2020 #35
Oh boy jberryhill May 2020 #36
The Northeastern U. modelers believe that by March 1 there were already 28,000 cases pnwmom May 2020 #38
You are right, and.... reACTIONary May 2020 #29
Me, my older brother and his wife all got sick early March but we think it was cstanleytech May 2020 #16
Not only that. We need to take a hard look at the 2019-20 flu season. Mike 03 May 2020 #5
I convinced a young relative to get the flu shot in late December, and a week later she got sick. pnwmom May 2020 #22
It's quite possible, since Cheeto knew in EARLY NOVEMBER this was coming sandensea May 2020 #10
The Quest antibody test can't distinguish Covid-19 from other coronavirus-based colds. moriah May 2020 #39
He should get the Abbott antibody test. It is apparently 99.9% accurate. SunSeeker May 2020 #41
I think the Dinosaurs had this bucolic_frolic May 2020 #9
the only question is by those who aren;t looking for the answers in the first place beachbumbob May 2020 #11
This is why testing is critical matt819 May 2020 #12
Yeah, the FL trip from the NE and back, that's me. Flew back Jan. 31, got sick 2 days Nay May 2020 #17
It will take months and years for science to understand how the virus in all its forms Cognitive_Resonance May 2020 #18
I had some bug in early January. roamer65 May 2020 #30
Was coronavirus here in December? Health officer has doubts Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2020 #37
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Antibody test results of ...»Reply #32