Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Javaman

(62,534 posts) Mon Jul 6, 2020, 10:20 AM Jul 2020

Source: washtington post

State officials in Colorado and Washington had asked the court to settle the matter in case November’s election proves close enough that a small number of what are sometimes called “faithless electors” could determine the outcome. The 2000 election, for instance, was decided by five electoral votes.

This story is developing and will be updated.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-electoral-college-faithless-electors/2020/07/06/cf88f706-bf8f-11ea-b178-bb7b05b94af1_story.html

that's all there is at the moment

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I thought they didn't want to touch elections with a ten foot pole /nt bucolic_frolic Jul 2020 #1

Copy of the Court's 9-0 opinion (.pdf).... PoliticAverse Jul 2020 #2

States have a lot of leeway in handling their electors. Kaleva Jul 2020 #3

"States May Require" jayfish Jul 2020 #4

No, but there are state laws with penalties nt Fiendish Thingy Jul 2020 #8

If the penalty is financial, then elected offices are up for auction lindysalsagal Jul 2020 #14

They either do, or they don't. not_the_one Jul 2020 #9

The "electoral college" doesn't say anything FBaggins Jul 2020 #12

Precisely. Igel Jul 2020 #27

... There has until now been no such stipulation, Ghost Dog Jul 2020 #6

Thank you Ghost Dog Jul 2020 #30

That's my point - the CT doesn't take that fact into consideration Fiendish Thingy Jul 2020 #19

My hope is AC_Mem Jul 2020 #25

The only reason he wants to win is to avoid jail and the label of "loser" nt Fiendish Thingy Jul 2020 #26

This is good for us. BGBD Jul 2020 #11

It goes beyond that BGBD Jul 2020 #15

It does not appear to do so FBaggins Jul 2020 #18

It does BGBD Jul 2020 #20

Nope FBaggins Jul 2020 #22

Wrong BGBD Jul 2020 #24

Hamilton and Madison BGBD Jul 2020 #21

So what happens if an elector votes "against" her state's choice? JustABozoOnThisBus Jul 2020 #28

This Wikipedia page has an excellent list of all past faithless electors... PoliticAverse Jul 2020 #29