Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

mahatmakanejeeves

(68,859 posts)

11. Somone's upset.

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Thu Jul 9, 2020, 09:57 AM

Jul 2020

Courts in the past have given “broad deference”. BUT NOT ME!

Link to tweet

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court blocks House Democrats from access to Trump's financial records for now [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2020 OP

What kind of bullshit headline is that? The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2020 #1

It's the only account of Mazars I could find. Everyone else is talking about Vance. mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2020 #3

Yes - the actual headline said COngress not Democrats. It has patricia92243 Jul 2020 #6

Then they changed it after I cut and pasted. I will go back. Thank you. mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2020 #8

Unfortunately, it's pretty much true. As CNN legal "expert" put it, "It's a legal defeat for trump, Hoyt Jul 2020 #7

The public wouldn't see the documents anyhow. The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2020 #9

It's not a practical victory at all. C_U_L8R Jul 2020 #12

He's been a confirmed criminal since day 1, and he's still in office. Hopefully, not much longer. Hoyt Jul 2020 #16

The end is near. Thank goodness. C_U_L8R Jul 2020 #17

Exactly. Hoyt Jul 2020 #18

Any bets they will DownriverDem Jul 2020 #19

No, because they haven't been turned over yet. The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2020 #20

One they can read aloud to Dumdum so he'll think he's still a winner Warpy Jul 2020 #24

SDNY does not want his returns, the NY prosecutor does. former9thward Jul 2020 #31

This, and the delayable actual tax records, is what I expected from roberts empedocles Jul 2020 #2

They're making so much of the "legislative" relevance bucolic_frolic Jul 2020 #4

This. Emphasizing legislative is limiting, considering it's a checks and balances oversight issue. JudyM Jul 2020 #15

boy they are definitely using bdamomma Jul 2020 #5

That's not what happened. The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2020 #10

thx for this explanation... dhill926 Jul 2020 #23

Yes, thanks for explanation bdamomma Jul 2020 #28

Not predictable at all. former9thward Jul 2020 #32

Your "They" includes Justices Ginsberg, Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan. OneCrazyDiamond Jul 2020 #29

thanks for bdamomma Jul 2020 #30

Somone's upset. mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2020 #11

The tweets he's putting out now are obviously written by someone else Bayard Jul 2020 #13

... Kali Jul 2020 #14

jesus...someone give him his binky already... dhill926 Jul 2020 #22

its all about control, the fascists control the justice system, they don't control the House yaesu Jul 2020 #21

Who are the two that dissented? Polybius Jul 2020 #25

Alito and Thomas. Per LBN rules, I'm limited to four paragraphs. NT mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2020 #26

Thomas and Alito muriel_volestrangler Jul 2020 #27