Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)

10. They may have told the truth on the 12th and then, to confuse the terrorists,

Reply to Comrade Grumpy (Reply #9)

Wed Oct 3, 2012, 03:35 AM

Oct 2012

have told a different story. It may have been an intentional way to confuse the terrorists in order to buy time to go in and attack the militants. Not many days later, it is my understanding some unarmed Libyans stormed an area in which militants were located and ousted the militants.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

State Dep't Rejects Call for UN Ambassador to Quit [View all] DonViejo Oct 2012 OP

King Peter has an awfully loud mouth bucolic_frolic Oct 2012 #1

They've got his title wrong. He's not a "senior Republican lawmaker", GoneOffShore Oct 2012 #2

I can't stand CNN. They have done nothing but character assasinate the president Liberal_Stalwart71 Oct 2012 #3

King can go pound sand! atreides1 Oct 2012 #4

So by King's logic, wouldn't she be in line to resign behind Romney? . . . Journeyman Oct 2012 #5

Peter King can't kick a duck in the ass. . . DinahMoeHum Oct 2012 #6

Normal people The Wizard Oct 2012 #7

Here is what Hillary Clinton stated on the day after the attack. JDPriestly Oct 2012 #8

I watched Susan Rice say those words five days after the attack... Comrade Grumpy Oct 2012 #9

They may have told the truth on the 12th and then, to confuse the terrorists, JDPriestly Oct 2012 #10