Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Texas Lawyer

(350 posts)
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 12:45 PM Oct 2012

Romney’s deduction cap would touch sensitive tax breaks [View all]

Source: Politico

Mitt Romney floated the idea of a $17,000 limit on itemized tax deductions Tuesday night — and is likely to get a quick lesson in the risks of providing details about his tax plans.

While a $17,000 limit would hit hardest on people in the highest tax brackets, it would take a bite out of a lot of homeowners who live in places where housing prices are high. A $500,000 mortgage, for example, would require interest payments that would exceed a $17,000 cap, leaving homeowners in and around many large cities with interest they could no longer deduct. Add in other deductions these homeowners are likely to take — including ones for state income tax — and it’s even easier to exceed the $17,000 cap.
...
Romney has proposed a rewrite of the tax code that would lower marginal tax rates and pay for it by narrowing or eliminating certain credits or deductions. But his vague plan has drawn many questions and charges that it would result in tax hikes on middle-income individuals and families.
...
A disproportionate share of mortgage interest deduction claims come from urban areas. And the GAO study noted that in 2008, tax returns from 10 such states — California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Virginia and Washington — accounted for 51 percent of mortgage interest and property tax deductions, even those states accounted for just 37 percent of all returns.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/81954.html



This news article is different from other articles reporting Romney's comment about capping the tax deduction because this article reports who will be affected and how they will be affected.

Specifically, Romney's proposed tax policy would disproportionately hurt voters in Colorado and Virginia. See http://gao.gov/assets/600/593752.pdf

We should make sure that voters in Colorado and Virginia are aware of this fact.

Also, this is just a tip-of-the-iceberg elimination of tax deductions affecting the middle class. If Romney is going to fund a reduction in the tax rates for the ultra-wealthy 1%, he's going to have to eliminate many, many more middle class tax deductions that just this proposal.
47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Keep on talking, Wrongney . . . fleur-de-lisa Oct 2012 #1
I hope Jim Lehrer holds Mitt's feet to the fire tonight and makes him explain himself renate Oct 2012 #2
The deduction cap may also negatively impact donations to the arts and charities no_hypocrisy Oct 2012 #3
but, but, but these agencies are supposed to do the work of helping the poor central scrutinizer Oct 2012 #7
The right has been at war... awoke_in_2003 Oct 2012 #10
Change 'may' to 'will' and you have something jmowreader Oct 2012 #40
This is not a legitimate proposal ... it's a contrivance bucolic_frolic Oct 2012 #4
How about we just extend the Bush Tax cuts for the lower 95% Cosmocat Oct 2012 #18
That's not how it works jmowreader Oct 2012 #41
I am TRYING to help my somewhat sane republican friends Cosmocat Oct 2012 #44
Is it just itemized deductions? I'm not sure that what he said. BlueStreak Oct 2012 #5
This is what he said: muriel_volestrangler Oct 2012 #14
It couldn't possibly be revenue neutral because BlueStreak Oct 2012 #15
BINGO Cosmocat Oct 2012 #21
Right. It was never intended to be revenue neutral BlueStreak Oct 2012 #25
You also forgot his corporate tax cut jmowreader Oct 2012 #42
There are more than two choices BlueStreak Oct 2012 #45
We could and should do all these things... jmowreader Oct 2012 #46
The GNCGFH Act of 2013. I like it. BlueStreak Oct 2012 #47
You need an annual income of roughly $150,000 to afford a $500,000 mortgage. Lasher Oct 2012 #6
$17,000 cap includes medical deductions, etc. emulatorloo Oct 2012 #8
Few People Get To Take Medical Deductions DallasNE Oct 2012 #13
Yup. For me the "etc." includes a couple of big deductible items: state income tax & property tax progree Oct 2012 #19
^Listen to Progree, he's smart...eom Kolesar Oct 2012 #22
Great post. N/t emulatorloo Oct 2012 #39
Your numbers are completely WRONG CreekDog Oct 2012 #9
Bay Area home buyers could still deduct *most* of their interest Kolesar Oct 2012 #16
look, if you are gung ho in defending the romney tax plan CreekDog Oct 2012 #26
That was stupid on your part Kolesar Oct 2012 #27
as proud as your are smug CreekDog Oct 2012 #31
I also find it laughable that you think someone can't get a mortgage more than 19% of gross income CreekDog Oct 2012 #11
Your ignorance doesn't make me wrong. Lasher Oct 2012 #32
I provided the numbers that show you are wrong CreekDog Oct 2012 #33
Ended up getting a cheaper place, did you? Lasher Oct 2012 #34
I didn't have a liar's loan, my income ratios were fine, my credit ratings well over 800... CreekDog Oct 2012 #35
OK let's take a closer look. Lasher Oct 2012 #36
you're saying my taxes should go up by 4000 so that the wealthy can have that money? CreekDog Oct 2012 #37
Looks like you're not laughing anymore. Lasher Oct 2012 #38
The Concept Makes No Sense DallasNE Oct 2012 #12
It is all WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION. Why should America be talking about this now? BlueStreak Oct 2012 #17
Isn't it crazy that Romney can beat up the President for "wealth redistribution" one day and then Texas Lawyer Oct 2012 #28
The deduction cap came out of Romney's dunce cap. Vapors. nt. OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #20
The laws regarding capital gains taxes on the sale of a house already harm people in the JDPriestly Oct 2012 #23
This would target Romney's prime profit harvesting zone. Turbineguy Oct 2012 #24
Yes. NutmegYankee Oct 2012 #43
And don't forget Ryan's "Broaden the base" OldHippieChick Oct 2012 #29
We need to broaden the base to lighten the load on the overburdened millionaires and billionaires Texas Lawyer Oct 2012 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Romney’s deduction cap wo...