Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: GOP Senate nominee: $600 virus unemployment benefit is 'way too much' [View all]The Velveteen Ocelot
(130,373 posts)17. But if they don't have jobs they don't have health insurance either.
I should think that most people would rather work for a little less cash upfront if they can have health insurance (especially during a pandemic), which they probably wouldn't be able to afford at all even with that extra $600. Many jobs have other benefits as well that they won't get if they don't go back to work.
Anyhow, the other big reason for the $600 payments, which is just as important as the benefit to individuals, is to get desperately-needed money into the economy. If people don't get that money they can't spend it on rent, food, consumer goods, etc., and the recession will get even worse.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
GOP Senate nominee: $600 virus unemployment benefit is 'way too much' [View all]
brooklynite
Aug 2020
OP
It's on top of normal unemployment benefits, and it's also generally not taxed
mr_lebowski
Aug 2020
#9
But if they don't have jobs they don't have health insurance either.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Aug 2020
#17
Right ... so the people called back to work are not the population he'd be addressing in this case.
mr_lebowski
Aug 2020
#27
Yeah, and I kinda think that part is bullshit too ... making people go back to non-essential work
mr_lebowski
Aug 2020
#28
I do think it could be reasonably argued that it should be sliding scale, like the benefit itself
mr_lebowski
Aug 2020
#5
The unemployed should get the same amount as Cam Newton got to transfer to Auburn
Coleman
Aug 2020
#6
I think a lot of people miss why it was set that high. People on unemployment have to spend the
LiberalArkie
Aug 2020
#8
If you want to see the economy grow - Give us seniors an extra $1000 a week from the fed.
LiberalArkie
Aug 2020
#34
I wrote a long, reasoned response but tossed it. F**k you Tubby Trumperville, and the tractor you
BamaRefugee
Aug 2020
#16
It's probably going to have to be changed to be whatever the person earned per week prior to losing
cstanleytech
Aug 2020
#18