Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Christian wedding photographer can't be forced to work same-sex weddings, judge rules [View all]sl8
(17,019 posts)54. Court order (PDF) :
http://www.adfmedia.org/files/ChelseyNelsonOrderPI.pdf
[..]
ORDER
1. The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Louisvilles motion to dismiss
(DN 14).1
2. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice the damages claims filed by Chelsey
Nelson Photography, LLC and Chelsey Nelson (together, Nelson).
3. The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Nelsons preliminary
injunction motion (DN 3).
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
The Court PRELIMINARILY ENJOINS2 Louisville/Jefferson County Metro
Government; Louisville Metro Human Relations Commission Enforcement; Kendall Boyd;
Marie Dever; Kevin Delahanty; Charles Lanier, Sr.; Laila Ramey; William Sutter; Ibrahim Syed;
and Leonard Thomas (in their official capacities) from taking the following actions against Nelson:
1. Invoking Metro Ordinance § 92.05(A) to compel Nelson to provide her wedding
photography services to express messages inconsistent with Nelsons beliefs in marriage between
one man and one woman, such as providing these services for same-sex wedding ceremonies; and
2. Invoking Metro Ordinance § 92.05(B) to prohibit Nelson from posting her desired
statements (DN 1-2; DN 1-3) on her website and from making materially similar statements on her
studios website, on her studios social media sites, or directly to prospective clients.
Nelson is substantially likely to succeed on her Free Speech claim. She doesnt need to
post a bond.
[...]
Much more at link.
[..]
ORDER
1. The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Louisvilles motion to dismiss
(DN 14).1
2. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice the damages claims filed by Chelsey
Nelson Photography, LLC and Chelsey Nelson (together, Nelson).
3. The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Nelsons preliminary
injunction motion (DN 3).
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
The Court PRELIMINARILY ENJOINS2 Louisville/Jefferson County Metro
Government; Louisville Metro Human Relations Commission Enforcement; Kendall Boyd;
Marie Dever; Kevin Delahanty; Charles Lanier, Sr.; Laila Ramey; William Sutter; Ibrahim Syed;
and Leonard Thomas (in their official capacities) from taking the following actions against Nelson:
1. Invoking Metro Ordinance § 92.05(A) to compel Nelson to provide her wedding
photography services to express messages inconsistent with Nelsons beliefs in marriage between
one man and one woman, such as providing these services for same-sex wedding ceremonies; and
2. Invoking Metro Ordinance § 92.05(B) to prohibit Nelson from posting her desired
statements (DN 1-2; DN 1-3) on her website and from making materially similar statements on her
studios website, on her studios social media sites, or directly to prospective clients.
Nelson is substantially likely to succeed on her Free Speech claim. She doesnt need to
post a bond.
[...]
Much more at link.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
102 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Christian wedding photographer can't be forced to work same-sex weddings, judge rules [View all]
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2020
OP
My instincts go that way too, but then I think how that plays out when applied to race
Sapient Donkey
Aug 2020
#41
Consider: A Christian troll wants to sue a lesbian baker after she made an antigay cake he ordered
Behind the Aegis
Aug 2020
#44
So it would be fine for the business to refuse to photograph other people's weddings?
yardwork
Aug 2020
#45
I guess if black people didn't want a bigot to make their lunch they shouldn't have sat in...
Hassin Bin Sober
Aug 2020
#69
You commented quickly with at least three posts in this thread, all blaming gay people.
yardwork
Aug 2020
#101
That's different from stating that they won't do business with a category of people.
yardwork
Aug 2020
#47
I would not want someone that hateful to photograph anything I am affiliated with.
appleannie1
Aug 2020
#4
Agreed. I'd make a confederate flag designed cake for a Civil War re-enactor party...
forgotmylogin
Aug 2020
#37
so its now legal for lgbt to discriminate against xtians. cool. btw the bible does NOT
msongs
Aug 2020
#8
Aside fr legal & political issues, cake writers are technicians, photographers are artists. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2020
#11
I just don't think THIS particular situation is a hill worth dying on, proverbially ...
mr_lebowski
Aug 2020
#30
So you'd have no problem with a photographer posting "whites only" in their website.
yardwork
Aug 2020
#49
Thanks for that ... if the ramifications extend far beyond working at weddings, then it's different
mr_lebowski
Aug 2020
#68
It will be ok for Protestants/Catholics to discriminate against each other.
keithbvadu2
Aug 2020
#19
Pretty sure she mothered the twins, not fathered them, but ... yeah ... that's hilarious ... (nt)
mr_lebowski
Aug 2020
#31
sure they can, atheism is a belief just like the jesus cult is a belief (not i did not say atheism
msongs
Aug 2020
#27
Good for you. Not everybody has a relative willing and able to take photographs.
yardwork
Aug 2020
#50
So are hypocrite Christian landlords allowed to refuse to rent to same sex couples and Muslims
usajumpedtheshark
Aug 2020
#42
I conclude from this thread that many DUers don't give a damn about civil rights.
yardwork
Aug 2020
#51
Thank you. Those who believe Black Lives Matter need to pay attention to this.
yardwork
Aug 2020
#71