Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(173,067 posts)
27. I found this article --
Fri Sep 18, 2020, 12:51 PM
Sep 2020
Judge Likely to Block Trump Ban on WeChat App
September 17, 2020 NICHOLAS IOVINO


SAN FRANCISCO (CN) — A federal judge signaled Thursday that she will likely block an executive order banning China’s most popular social media app, WeChat, in the United States because it is unconstitutionally vague and could violate Americans’ free speech rights. “I’m sympathetic to the anxiety that it creates for the people who are affected, and therein lies the vagueness concern which is really wrapped in a little bit that this is the only mode of communication for people,” U.S. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler said during a virtual court hearing. More than 19 million Americans use WeChat, one of the few social media apps the Chinese government allows to operate within its borders, and which enables people in the U.S. to communicate with friends and relatives in China.

Citing national security concerns, President Donald Trump signed two executive orders on Aug. 6 calling for a ban on Chinese apps WeChat and TikTok to take effect within 45 days. The directive relies on presidential authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which enables the government to seek criminal penalties of up to 20 years in prison and $1 million fines against those who violate restrictions authorized under the law. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross is expected to issue regulations for the social media apps by Sunday, the same the day the bans are scheduled to take effect.

Nonprofit group U.S. WeChat Users Alliance and others sued the Trump administration on Aug. 21, claiming the ban violates their constitutional rights and erodes a critical communication bridge between China and the U.S. Appearing in Judge Beeler’s virtual courtroom Thursday, lawyers for the group asked for a preliminary injunction to block Trump’s exec ive order from taking effect. “Millions will lose the ability to check in on their relatives here and in China,” the plaintiffs’ attorney Michael Bien of Rosen Bien Galvan & Grunfeld said. But a Justice Department lawyer argued that WeChat users suffered no harm that would justify a preliminary injunction because the executive order hasn’t yet taken effect.

Commerce Department rules defining what is a restricted “transaction” are expected to be announced on Sunday. “Here we have an order that has no force or effect until the Commerce secretary makes his findings,” Justice Department lawyer Michael Drezner argued. On Wednesday, the Justice Department told Beeler in a sworn statement that the Commerce Department does not plan to define the “use or downloading of the app to convey personal or business information between users” as a restricted transaction in its forthcoming regulations. The plaintiffs say that assurance falls far short of addressing significant constitutional concerns related to the executive order. Other activities, such as using the app to store or manage data, could still be deemed a prohibited transaction under the new rules, they argue.

More: https://www.courthousenews.com/judge-likely-to-block-trump-ban-on-wechat-app/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If this doesn't get GenZ to the polls nothing will MaryMagdaline Sep 2020 #1
Right. He's such a vengeful dumb a** that he'll lose lots more voters right there! Are we living Illumination Sep 2020 #30
that ought to cinch the new 18 yr old voters! samnsara Sep 2020 #2
Still pissed the K-Pop fans pranked him and his campaign in Tulsa. irisblue Sep 2020 #3
THIS Talitha Sep 2020 #15
agreed BadGimp Sep 2020 #32
exactly, he's revengeful & petty. It will backfire spectacularly as it w/ fire up the young people onetexan Sep 2020 #26
I thought Republicans didn't want Guberment in our lives?!?! Bengus81 Sep 2020 #4
+1 treestar Sep 2020 #29
Dumbasses Roy Rolling Sep 2020 #5
How very China-like. johnp3907 Sep 2020 #6
I guess he's now selectively in favor of the First Amendment. Note that everyone.... George II Sep 2020 #7
I had the thought that BumRushDaShow Sep 2020 #9
I hope the European Union will follow... TomVilmer Sep 2020 #8
And add Instagram and SnapChat while they're at it. BumRushDaShow Sep 2020 #10
How is this not a violation of the First Amendment? Tom Traubert Sep 2020 #11
I expect someone will file suit and request an emergency TRO. BumRushDaShow Sep 2020 #13
And yet money remains free speech ArizonaLib Sep 2020 #16
Money and corporations BumRushDaShow Sep 2020 #18
Looks like at least one action has been commenced. Tom Traubert Sep 2020 #14
This is retaliation against Sarah Cooper progressive nobody Sep 2020 #12
If they can ban those, they can ban Diebold voting machines and their software ArizonaLib Sep 2020 #17
...significant action to combat China's malicious collection of American citizens' personal data, Firestorm49 Sep 2020 #19
The most surprising thing about this article is that they attribute those quotes Guy Whitey Corngood Sep 2020 #20
funny nt leftofthestorm Sep 2020 #36
I notice no such ban on russian bots, trolls, data mining, lpropaganda. But, we understand, niyad Sep 2020 #21
There is nothing wrong saying that melm00se Sep 2020 #22
K&R JonLP24 Sep 2020 #23
"This whole thing is a horrifying joke, but this ban surprised me: ..." mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2020 #24
Is this legal? Has anything like this been done in the US? Sapient Donkey Sep 2020 #25
I found this article -- BumRushDaShow Sep 2020 #27
I hope it is blocked. It would be very concerning if it's allowed to go through. Sapient Donkey Sep 2020 #28
This appears to have gotten the attention of the libertarian, tech-bros. LudwigPastorius Sep 2020 #31
VPN usage among Chinese nationals will now increase. mwooldri Sep 2020 #33
Is there any actual evidence? Aussie105 Sep 2020 #34
Many speculate that this is a result of what happened back in June BumRushDaShow Sep 2020 #35
Can anybody say "censorship"? zanana1 Sep 2020 #37
Well apparently this "distraction" was just negated by this announcement-- BumRushDaShow Sep 2020 #38
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US will ban WeChat and Ti...»Reply #27