Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

George II

(67,782 posts)
10. But she punted! She has no problem with the Judiciary Committee reviewing trump's nominee....
Sat Sep 19, 2020, 04:34 PM
Sep 2020

...and that there should be no vote on trump's nominee BEFORE THE ELECTION!

But even when Biden wins, trump's nominee will already be in the process, and if the Committee votes to go to the full Senate, there will be a VOTE on trump's nominee!

She's playing both sides here.

Great! I'll take it. Now vote her out regardless! OrlandoDem2 Sep 2020 #1
Concerned? yankee87 Sep 2020 #2
Yes, she will. LogicFirst Sep 2020 #30
For now . . Iliyah Sep 2020 #3
LOL...yep, been down this road before Bengus81 Sep 2020 #48
wtf does that mean... Thomas Hurt Sep 2020 #4
Doesn't it mean she will not vote for the SCOTUS candidate if Joe wins? DonaldsRump Sep 2020 #7
If a President nominates someone, that President has already chosen the Justice... Thomas Hurt Sep 2020 #12
But how will she feel after she comes in second place? StTimofEdenRoc Sep 2020 #5
This x1000 Capt. America Sep 2020 #58
They are all going to say this. They'll just vote after the election JDC Sep 2020 #6
But she said the decision should be made by the President that is elected in Nov. oldsoftie Sep 2020 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author Dan Sep 2020 #8
For now Etherealoc1 Sep 2020 #9
But she punted! She has no problem with the Judiciary Committee reviewing trump's nominee.... George II Sep 2020 #10
BINGO!!!!! nt sfstaxprep Sep 2020 #60
This is a nothing statement. She doesn't commit to not voting for the nominee... Drunken Irishman Sep 2020 #11
It IS a pointless statement, because it's already been said that the Senate schedule is such that... thesquanderer Sep 2020 #26
I agree - tho, I was told silly for pointing out it might be delayed until after the election. Drunken Irishman Sep 2020 #32
Good for her jorgevlorgan Sep 2020 #13
IMO, The GOP has counted the votes. Collins' is not needed to confirm. Safe statement Raven123 Sep 2020 #14
Her Dem opponent, Sara Gideon, has been raking in tons of money since last night. Mrs. Overall Sep 2020 #15
PRIOR TO THE ELECTION just another useless republican nt msongs Sep 2020 #16
For now JustAnotherGen Sep 2020 #17
I'll believe her when she Polly Hennessey Sep 2020 #18
Bullshit Yellowdog88 Sep 2020 #19
Collins is trailing by 5+ pts. Let's face it, she sees it as an election ploy. Thekaspervote Sep 2020 #20
-17 OhioTim Sep 2020 #43
Uh-huh. Sure. AngryOldDem Sep 2020 #21
But after the election..... calguy Sep 2020 #22
I wouldn't trust Collins .. jb5150 Sep 2020 #23
I stopped believing anything any republican says Mr.Bill Sep 2020 #24
Don't believe her. The Kavanaugh confirmation Karma13612 Sep 2020 #25
Just like McDonnell Traildogbob Sep 2020 #33
Only for her election chances, and she will be for replacing her in the lame duck. Don't fall for Pisces Sep 2020 #27
Vote Collins out rockfordfile Sep 2020 #28
Snort. She says one thing now and then that concern of hers will kick in. Solly Mack Sep 2020 #29
Prior to the election is just weasel words. It means she will vote to confirm after the election. Statistical Sep 2020 #31
She is against everything until she is for it at the last minute. appleannie1 Sep 2020 #34
Donnie's going to nominate quickly.. paleotn Sep 2020 #35
This will last until Mitch makes the googly eyes at her while promising action on Vinca Sep 2020 #36
Did she not vote for Gorsuch, lets take a looksee............. turbinetree Sep 2020 #37
She just doesn't want it to be an election issue. Gore1FL Sep 2020 #38
Translation: Miguelito Loveless Sep 2020 #39
Any bets on this latest bout of this Concern? marble falls Sep 2020 #40
her lips say no no Marthe48 Sep 2020 #41
People need to understand that the lame duck is going to be the play. They'll hold it open ... mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2020 #42
she and all Refukkkchickens have acquired Dumbp's pathology - ignore her completely bringthePaine Sep 2020 #44
But she'd still vote for any joker that Trump nominates anyway. NurseJackie Sep 2020 #45
Mitch is trying to save her seat. Mz Pip Sep 2020 #47
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Pobeka Sep 2020 #49
Uh huh Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2020 #50
And then she'll turn right around and vote for the nominee anyway. sakabatou Sep 2020 #51
This is her usual worthlessness. She'll vote for a Trump nominee anyway. Greg K Sep 2020 #52
I'd trust a rattlesnake before I trust Collins Yeehah Sep 2020 #53
Bet you as soon as the election is over she will completely support it before her butt hits the cstanleytech Sep 2020 #54
I do not trust Susan Collins. riversedge Sep 2020 #55
Define oppose quakerboy Sep 2020 #56
and eventually she'll stop persisting, sooner than later Demonaut Sep 2020 #57
Good. OneCrazyDiamond Sep 2020 #59
Don't believe it. She's only there to create a distraction. tavernier Sep 2020 #61
People aren't believing anything she says anymore, duforsure Sep 2020 #62
She'll cave. She always caves. zanana1 Sep 2020 #63
Collins is almost certainly going to lose Polybius Sep 2020 #64
I believe anything that woman says as much as I believe whatever Trump says. Nitram Sep 2020 #65
Translated: show her the sugar. malthaussen Sep 2020 #66
One down! Three to go. mahina Oct 2020 #67
She expressed concern over the timing. She didn't say she's a "no" vote. JustABozoOnThisBus Oct 2020 #68
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News» Collins opposes replacin...»Reply #10