Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

StevieM

(10,578 posts)
9. Actually, yes they are.
Fri Sep 25, 2020, 04:45 PM
Sep 2020

They will blame this situation on Hillary for decades to come. And that is what they wanted most--to have a vehicle with which to lambast her for years to come. The valued that more than the future of our country.

Misogyny runs deep in our society.

To be fair, though, she would have won anyway had it not been for James Comey's repeated illegitimate actions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 regressive SCOTUS Justices in 4 years. maxsolomon Sep 2020 #1
If he's re-elected, maybe 4 or 5 Polybius Sep 2020 #35
I Think She Disqualified Herself With Her Statements in 2016 Re Vacancy TomCADem Sep 2020 #40
She's 48. BlueStater Sep 2020 #2
I have changed the Original Post to reflect that...Sorry for the mistake... Stuart G Sep 2020 #3
Curious as to what age you originally put Polybius Sep 2020 #33
REICH WING FUCKING LUNATIC. AZ8theist Sep 2020 #28
She has 3 years experience as a judge. milestogo Sep 2020 #39
Democrats should boycott the hearings bucolic_frolic Sep 2020 #4
We will see what happens...& we will have a plan to defeat this, one way or another. Stuart G Sep 2020 #7
If a boycott is the plan... VarryOn Sep 2020 #27
Every Democrat who did not vote for Hillary last time DFW Sep 2020 #5
Actually, yes they are. StevieM Sep 2020 #9
What a surprise! - Goodbye, abortion. Goodbye Obamacare rurallib Sep 2020 #6
Hello Canada TeamPooka Sep 2020 #12
Have you forgotten they won't let us in? rurallib Sep 2020 #13
Judge Handmaiden. Scarlet robe and "wings" hat for her. kairos12 Sep 2020 #8
I hope anyone that CAN, WILL Karma13612 Sep 2020 #15
Crap if bdamomma Sep 2020 #22
Handmaids Tale here we come! jorgevlorgan Sep 2020 #10
Kamala Harris should have the majority of the time exboyfil Sep 2020 #11
No surprise there Karma13612 Sep 2020 #14
trump bdamomma Sep 2020 #24
Eee yup n/t Karma13612 Sep 2020 #30
They're only rushing this because they know Trump's going to lose and they'll be weaker post 11/3 bucolic_frolic Sep 2020 #16
I believe that if this drags on past election day the lame duck Senate would still confirm her. totodeinhere Sep 2020 #20
Which is why the Democrats should increase SCOTUS to 13 otherwise SCOTUS will be broken. cstanleytech Sep 2020 #26
And then the next time the Republicans are in power they will increase it to 17. totodeinhere Sep 2020 #29
They already started that ball rolling by corrupting the courts and if we do nothing to address it cstanleytech Sep 2020 #36
I still favor the National Court of Appeals proposal.... lastlib Sep 2020 #31
Amy Coney Barrett is to Ruth Bader Ginsburg what Clarence Thomas is to Thurgood Marshall. SunSeeker Sep 2020 #17
this llashram Sep 2020 #19
Thurgood Marshall should have waited for Bush to lose to retire Polybius Sep 2020 #34
Conclusion: our side is not very good at this game BeyondGeography Sep 2020 #38
I just wonder: Will Single payer gets a new life if Obamacare struck down? Raven123 Sep 2020 #18
You mean, he's actually nominating her husband, right? hamsterjill Sep 2020 #21
Right? They should have her husband come to be questioned at the confirmation hearings. SunSeeker Sep 2020 #23
I hope the Democrats have the launch codes ready for their own nuclear option of increasing SCOTUS cstanleytech Sep 2020 #25
What? Joel Osteen turned it down? TheFarseer Sep 2020 #32
Justice Crazy-Eyes lapfog_1 Sep 2020 #37
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sources Say Trump to Choo...»Reply #9