Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 regressive SCOTUS Justices in 4 years. maxsolomon Sep 2020 #1
If he's re-elected, maybe 4 or 5 Polybius Sep 2020 #35
I Think She Disqualified Herself With Her Statements in 2016 Re Vacancy TomCADem Sep 2020 #40
She's 48. BlueStater Sep 2020 #2
I have changed the Original Post to reflect that...Sorry for the mistake... Stuart G Sep 2020 #3
Curious as to what age you originally put Polybius Sep 2020 #33
REICH WING FUCKING LUNATIC. AZ8theist Sep 2020 #28
She has 3 years experience as a judge. milestogo Sep 2020 #39
Democrats should boycott the hearings bucolic_frolic Sep 2020 #4
We will see what happens...& we will have a plan to defeat this, one way or another. Stuart G Sep 2020 #7
If a boycott is the plan... VarryOn Sep 2020 #27
Every Democrat who did not vote for Hillary last time DFW Sep 2020 #5
Actually, yes they are. StevieM Sep 2020 #9
What a surprise! - Goodbye, abortion. Goodbye Obamacare rurallib Sep 2020 #6
Hello Canada TeamPooka Sep 2020 #12
Have you forgotten they won't let us in? rurallib Sep 2020 #13
Judge Handmaiden. Scarlet robe and "wings" hat for her. kairos12 Sep 2020 #8
I hope anyone that CAN, WILL Karma13612 Sep 2020 #15
Crap if bdamomma Sep 2020 #22
Handmaids Tale here we come! jorgevlorgan Sep 2020 #10
Kamala Harris should have the majority of the time exboyfil Sep 2020 #11
No surprise there Karma13612 Sep 2020 #14
trump bdamomma Sep 2020 #24
Eee yup n/t Karma13612 Sep 2020 #30
They're only rushing this because they know Trump's going to lose and they'll be weaker post 11/3 bucolic_frolic Sep 2020 #16
I believe that if this drags on past election day the lame duck Senate would still confirm her. totodeinhere Sep 2020 #20
Which is why the Democrats should increase SCOTUS to 13 otherwise SCOTUS will be broken. cstanleytech Sep 2020 #26
And then the next time the Republicans are in power they will increase it to 17. totodeinhere Sep 2020 #29
They already started that ball rolling by corrupting the courts and if we do nothing to address it cstanleytech Sep 2020 #36
I still favor the National Court of Appeals proposal.... lastlib Sep 2020 #31
Amy Coney Barrett is to Ruth Bader Ginsburg what Clarence Thomas is to Thurgood Marshall. SunSeeker Sep 2020 #17
this llashram Sep 2020 #19
Thurgood Marshall should have waited for Bush to lose to retire Polybius Sep 2020 #34
Conclusion: our side is not very good at this game BeyondGeography Sep 2020 #38
I just wonder: Will Single payer gets a new life if Obamacare struck down? Raven123 Sep 2020 #18
You mean, he's actually nominating her husband, right? hamsterjill Sep 2020 #21
Right? They should have her husband come to be questioned at the confirmation hearings. SunSeeker Sep 2020 #23
I hope the Democrats have the launch codes ready for their own nuclear option of increasing SCOTUS cstanleytech Sep 2020 #25
What? Joel Osteen turned it down? TheFarseer Sep 2020 #32
Justice Crazy-Eyes lapfog_1 Sep 2020 #37
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sources Say Trump to Choo...»Reply #35