Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]58Sunliner
(6,279 posts)151. "We need to shock the drooling imbecile voters into REALITY."
That will never happen. But we can energize our base into feeling like they are voting and acting with a purpose and telling the truth will allow us to do so. Take environmental pollution and the resultant health care and health care costs that are associated with it. Highlight the cost to human lives and the financial burden people and states struggle with. It is just not that complicated on some issues. Then tie into the whole strategy of green energy and green jobs, along with corporate profits and responsibility. Why do the rich in DC allow these corps to poison us?? Who bears the brunt of those policies? The rates of asthma have rocketed. It is insane that we can not forge a cohesive strategy to highlight these issues.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
239 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Indeed. The idea that voters in Kentucky would trade the Senate Majority Leader
stopbush
Nov 2020
#136
We keep trying to tone it down for dissatisfied GOP, Blue Dogs, and it only seems ...
marble falls
Nov 2020
#82
I'm sure it didn't. Truly conservative people don't like young know-it-alls because they're.....
jaxexpat
Nov 2020
#225
Keep in mind that we lost a lot of swing votes because of the fear of 'socialism'.
Chemisse
Nov 2020
#112
So you take The Guardian's spin that we've been in a "truce"? As if we've been embattled?
ancianita
Nov 2020
#89
Shouldn't she bide her time as others before her have done! Remember, she supported Bernie Sanders
MojoWrkn
Nov 2020
#206
Maybe the incompetent people were the ones who decided a good slogan was "defund the police"
pnwmom
Nov 2020
#85
Maybe we outsmart their pejorative use of the word "socialist," by showing everyone how they
ancianita
Nov 2020
#210
she's right but democrats AND progressives like her keep letting 1500 radio stations, the
certainot
Nov 2020
#71
That didn't take long. A day or two ago she was bashing Conor Lamb's campaign for his loss....
George II
Nov 2020
#4
Members do not get disciplined for voicing their opinions. We live in a democracy.
vsrazdem
Nov 2020
#49
What attack was she responding to? Did you see her off-base attack on Conor Lamb yesterday....
George II
Nov 2020
#31
According to Progressive Punch her progressive score puts her at #169 in the House....
George II
Nov 2020
#21
Fascinating. Not what I would have expected. --- It reminds me somewhat of...
NurseJackie
Nov 2020
#50
Unfortunately some of those "protest votes" were off-base. The most visible one was a vote....
George II
Nov 2020
#239
I do wish we could keep these policy discussions out of the media until after Jan 5th
groundloop
Nov 2020
#8
There the media goes again, and there some of us will go again lapping this shit up
tulipsandroses
Nov 2020
#10
Well said. Bernie Sanders was just on MSNBC and he put it well, the progressives are an integral
c-rational
Nov 2020
#35
In that NYT interview, she was bashing Conor Lamb's "losing" campaign because he didn't spend....
George II
Nov 2020
#52
I too wish Democrats would spend more time taking on Republicans than their fellow Democrats.
EarlG
Nov 2020
#67
Let's not buy into the pot-stirring with some of these out-of-context interviews...
hlthe2b
Nov 2020
#14
Republicans overperformed this year down ballot because of Trump on the ticket
bucolic_frolic
Nov 2020
#17
Personally, at this time silence is golden. I am a rational progressive. What is reasonable.
olegramps
Nov 2020
#36
I agree totally. Let us pursue what is possible. That is why Biden won. A reasonable measured path.
olegramps
Nov 2020
#43
Wait until the right rebrands itself: We're going to miss the alt-right, the Tea Party and neo-cons.
shotten99
Nov 2020
#164
Knee capping can only happen if we let The Guardian use words like "truce" and presenting AOC
ancianita
Nov 2020
#46
At times like this, she'd be well-served to ask herself "WWND?" (What would Nancy do?)
NurseJackie
Nov 2020
#45
No worries we have the Kasich/Flake wing of the party to replace the Progressives. I'm
jalan48
Nov 2020
#74
'a no-holds-barred, post-election interview with the New York Times,'? 'interpreted by the Guardian?
elleng
Nov 2020
#96
My position is this squabbling from anyone should wait until after the Georgia runoffs
still_one
Nov 2020
#103
A couple of weeks ago, I remember a lot of us being excited by the turnout of young voters.
Lonestarblue
Nov 2020
#124
People cheered we lost Doug Jones and he is very frustrating. His loss didn't help us any.
LizBeth
Nov 2020
#142
That is the issue with Sanders style progressive. A lack of forward thinking which is kinda ironic
LizBeth
Nov 2020
#153
I think progressive messaging probably did play a part in some of the losses but
cstanleytech
Nov 2020
#156
It doesn't matter. Her extensive words are flying around for our detractors to reframe and not
Ninga
Nov 2020
#172
That's a very astute post, Ninga! She'd be wise to ask herself "What Would Nancy Do?"...
NurseJackie
Nov 2020
#180
Yes. Leader Pelosi has an admirable level of savvy along with an uncanny ability to read her
Ninga
Nov 2020
#184
Trashed the thread...with an important run off in GA, I question her timing.
Demsrule86
Nov 2020
#234