Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump administration removes experts from Defense Policy Board [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(105,872 posts)11. Fuck me - ask the DoD about the DAB and they redirect to to a Wikipedia clone
https://pentagontours.osd.mil/Tours/dod-components.html
"Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee" is a link to http://www.wikiwand.com/en/Defense_Policy_Board_Advisory_Committee
It's not even a good Wikipedia entry. It's marked as "This article has multiple issues" - which was why I was searching .mil for something about the board in the first place - Wikipedia has out of date links (eg it hasn't been updated since March, and doesn't list Harman or Albright, but does list Kissinger).
I suspect this means the board has been sidelined for ages. And that the idea of chucking some out and inserting some of the worst Trump ideologues is to build their resumes for their imminent unemployment, to persuade wingnut welfare foundations that these are Very Serious People who should be given Very Serious paychecks for spouting far right nonsense.
"Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee" is a link to http://www.wikiwand.com/en/Defense_Policy_Board_Advisory_Committee
It's not even a good Wikipedia entry. It's marked as "This article has multiple issues" - which was why I was searching .mil for something about the board in the first place - Wikipedia has out of date links (eg it hasn't been updated since March, and doesn't list Harman or Albright, but does list Kissinger).
I suspect this means the board has been sidelined for ages. And that the idea of chucking some out and inserting some of the worst Trump ideologues is to build their resumes for their imminent unemployment, to persuade wingnut welfare foundations that these are Very Serious People who should be given Very Serious paychecks for spouting far right nonsense.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I just wonder WTF he plans to do in the next 2 months that he wants them out of his way.
RKP5637
Nov 2020
#9
I keep wondering about Iran, are his chosen going to say sure, nuke them, no problem.
RKP5637
Nov 2020
#28
"... national security officials who "provide ... independent, informed advice and opinions ..."
Jim__
Nov 2020
#4
Fuck me - ask the DoD about the DAB and they redirect to to a Wikipedia clone
muriel_volestrangler
Nov 2020
#11
Trump is clearly being spiteful and trying to do as much damage to the country as he can so Biden
cstanleytech
Nov 2020
#18
More chucked out: career naval officer, a Clinton official, and a GW Bush official
muriel_volestrangler
Nov 2020
#41
What a petty and sick man. He will undoubtedly will go down as worst ever president.
olegramps
Nov 2020
#42
