Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Neal Katyal Argues U.S. Corporations Should Not Be Liable for Using Child Slaves Abroad, But SCOTUS [View all]mopinko
(73,507 posts)51. nope. that's an oath to join the bar.
also includes being tapped for pro bono cases if a judge thinks you havent done enough of them.
what makes you think they are free to make up their own rules?
i'm not saying they dont. surely they do.
but they took an oath.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Neal Katyal Argues U.S. Corporations Should Not Be Liable for Using Child Slaves Abroad, But SCOTUS [View all]
Calista241
Dec 2020
OP
i did that and also 3 musketeers also , when they changed the taste i quit .
AllaN01Bear
Dec 2020
#6
Isn't Nestle the company that was basically stealing water from one of the Great Lakes
judesedit
Dec 2020
#13
I love this personhood rights timeline from Reclaim Democracy's corporate personhood pages.
CrispyQ
Dec 2020
#18
Sure, Nestle is truly evil, but how can Neal Katyal not feel shamed to defend them? Another asshole
kysrsoze
Dec 2020
#11
There's a difference between saying believe what you want w/o gov't interference
Calista241
Dec 2020
#32
Disappointing to read that Katyal is involved with supporting this litigation. And yes, Nestle is
in2herbs
Dec 2020
#31
Maybe as a frequent MSNBC guest he was using reverse psychology to deal with conservative justices.
Towlie
Dec 2020
#34
look at the inverse, why doesn't US be subjected to World Court jurisdiction?
beachbumbob
Dec 2020
#35
These are just things I found on his Wikipedia, I'm sure there's more, and a Wiki can be tilted in
BamaRefugee
Dec 2020
#40