Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: House Democrat invokes Civil War amendment that would prevent 126 Republicans from being seated in C [View all]ripcord
(5,553 posts)61. Filing a case in the courts is not hindering
You don't know much about the law do you?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
122 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
House Democrat invokes Civil War amendment that would prevent 126 Republicans from being seated in C [View all]
Tom Yossarian Joad
Dec 2020
OP
Close But No Cigar....Allen West's Comments Arguably Are Rebellion and Insurrection
Stallion
Dec 2020
#2
Hindering or not, you can bet Repugs will try to charge Dems w/ sedition THE SECOND they can
sandensea
Dec 2020
#85
Filing frivolous lawsuits can raise serious legal issues. "By force" is the important point.
DonaldsRump
Dec 2020
#108
What I find hard to understand is confusion about the difference between the Texas legislature.....
jaxexpat
Dec 2020
#80
Right on, ripcord. Their sin is trying to get the courts to do what they don't have the courage to.
Nitram
Dec 2020
#65
I totally agree with this! If democrats care enough about our democracy to FIGHT FOR IT, this
BComplex
Dec 2020
#5
Yes, yes, yes. Many of their lawsuits were not about the law but about the posturing, the argument,
c-rational
Dec 2020
#28
Exactly. When people, both on the left and the right, say is committing treason
Fortinbras Armstrong
Dec 2020
#114
Using the rule of law to overturn the rule of law strikes at our legal sovereignty
bucolic_frolic
Dec 2020
#6
Do It. Make their districts hold special elections to replace the Seditious Traitors. nt
Tommymac
Dec 2020
#7
And they could then suffer yet another humiliating Supreme Court defeat. n/t
PoliticAverse
Dec 2020
#45
Great idea. Change the public narrative from Trump to Republican subversion of our
jalan48
Dec 2020
#13
Can you explain to me how working through the courts could possibly be treason?
ripcord
Dec 2020
#20
Sadly there are roughly half a dozen DUers who support what the Republicans did and say it was legal
RAB910
Dec 2020
#18
There is a huge difference between that imo. Was it legal? Yes? Ethical? Hell no!!!!
cstanleytech
Dec 2020
#32
To be fair they could have been referring to someone else and not you or the others.
cstanleytech
Dec 2020
#43
I'll believe someone is actually an attorney here when I see their law license.
58Sunliner
Dec 2020
#48
Sadly there are DUers that disparage DUers who point out what the governing law and precedent is
onenote
Dec 2020
#34
I would love it could be done but their signing on to a case to go before SCOTUS does not
cstanleytech
Dec 2020
#31
Reducing the judicial abuse of our country and our constitution to "tit for tat" is a false analogy.
58Sunliner
Dec 2020
#44
Let's be clear. What they did has never been done in our 250+ year history.
onecaliberal
Dec 2020
#67
Nancy should have something up her sleeve to make 126 R house members sweat a little.
KS Toronado
Dec 2020
#41
Republicans are emboldened because that's what voters in their state or district wants
JI7
Dec 2020
#86
Excuse me but they have imagined all liberals on the wrong side of a firing squad.
Arne
Dec 2020
#84
The Republicans are only playing to their base of ignoramuses; just nonsense.
olegramps
Dec 2020
#112