Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bhikkhu

(10,789 posts)
22. You can click on the "Full Text PDF" link on the upper right
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 09:11 PM
Oct 2012

which gives you a 12 page document. This is from page 4:

"The peak years for annual con-
sumption of HFCS coincided with the peak growth rates
of ASD in California, the only state that reports number
of cases of ASD dating back to the mid-1980s [4]. The
Mercury Toxicity Model shows the HFCS characteristics
most likely contributing to autism include the zinc-
depleting effect that comes from consuming HFCS and
certain food colors found in processed foods, and the
additional Hg exposure that may occur from the low Hg
concentrations sometimes found in HFCS as a result of
the manufacturing process [4,17]. This model can be
expanded to include additional adverse effects associated
with the consumption of HFCS that likely contribute to
the development of autism through PON1 gene modula-
tion and lead intoxication."

Its a complex argument I haven't gone through myself. The graph I attached was just one that had the most up to date numbers showing the levelling-off to stable trend for HFCS consumption. It just happened to include a line for autism frequency.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This shit gives Dems a bad name banned from Kos Oct 2012 #1
an what does this have to do with democrats? bloomberg is not a democrat nt msongs Oct 2012 #5
Has nothing to do with Dems glacierbay Oct 2012 #6
Weellll.... markpkessinger Oct 2012 #7
You nailed it. glacierbay Oct 2012 #9
Most people associate him with the GOP LTR Oct 2012 #28
He acts like one 90% of the time Ter Oct 2012 #16
"Extreme-left legislation"? Scootaloo Oct 2012 #27
Is it moderate or extreme right? Ter Oct 2012 #29
I think you need to learn what "extreme left" means Scootaloo Oct 2012 #34
It's not right, moderate, or libertarian Ter Oct 2012 #36
you have no clue what you are talking about erodriguez Oct 2012 #31
bloomberg ran on the gop line. I never voted for him because he thinks he is the boss. hrmjustin Oct 2012 #26
This is stupid legislation tarheelsunc Oct 2012 #2
Good glacierbay Oct 2012 #3
They should simply impose a tax on sugary soft drinks, period. JDPriestly Oct 2012 #11
I could support a tax on sugerary soft drinks. glacierbay Oct 2012 #12
Why don't they just use cane sugar instead of high fructose corn syrup? bhikkhu Oct 2012 #4
Agreed... markpkessinger Oct 2012 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author AnotherMcIntosh Oct 2012 #10
Which legislation? sl8 Oct 2012 #13
Diet or other non-sugary drinks are exempted bhikkhu Oct 2012 #14
Nonsense dkhbrit Oct 2012 #15
Quit trying to "Corn Troll" the situation. They_Live Oct 2012 #17
Well, there's the Princeton study, bhikkhu Oct 2012 #19
WRT the Clinical Epigenetics study ... sl8 Oct 2012 #20
You can click on the "Full Text PDF" link on the upper right bhikkhu Oct 2012 #22
Doh! Thanks. sl8 Oct 2012 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author sl8 Oct 2012 #23
And the May 2012 Duke study, linking liver disease to HFCS bhikkhu Oct 2012 #21
Its a public health issue LiberalLovinLug Oct 2012 #18
There are lots of things christx30 Oct 2012 #32
Difference between banning and curbing LiberalLovinLug Oct 2012 #33
The problem with that is christx30 Oct 2012 #35
"Big Soda" rears it's ugly head Canuckistanian Oct 2012 #25
I like Bloomberg but people should drink what they want Pokoyo Oct 2012 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Soda Industry Sues to Sto...»Reply #22