Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
30. ... so many...suffer under a single tyrant who has no other power than the power they give him;
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 07:56 PM
Oct 2012

who is able to harm them only to the extent to which they have the willingness to bear with him; who could do them absolutely no injury unless they preferred to put up with him rather than contradict him ....
...
...You live in such a way that you cannot claim a single thing as your own; and it would seem that you consider yourselves lucky to be loaned your property, your families, and your very lives. All this havoc, this misfortune, this ruin, descends upon you not from alien foes, but from the one enemy whom you yourselves render as powerful as he is, for whom you go bravely to war, for whose greatness you do not refuse to offer your own bodies unto death. He who thus domineers over you has only two eyes, only two hands, only one body, no more than is possessed by the least man among the infinite numbers dwelling in your cities; he has indeed nothing more than the power that you confer upon him to destroy you. Where has he acquired enough eyes to spy upon you, if you do not provide them yourselves? How can he have so many arms to beat you with, if he does not borrow them from you? The feet that trample down your cities, where does he get them if they are not your own? How does he have any power over you except through you? How would he dare assail you if he had no cooperation from you?

... who could believe reports of what goes on every day among the inhabitants of some countries, who could really believe that one man alone may mistreat a hundred thousand and deprive them of their liberty?... Obviously there is no need of fighting to overcome this single tyrant, for he is automatically defeated if the country refuses consent to its own enslavement: ... it is not necessary to deprive him of anything, but simply to give him nothing; there is no need that the country make an effort to do anything for itself provided it does nothing against itself. It is therefore the inhabitants themselves who permit, or, rather, bring about, their own subjection, since by ceasing to submit they would put an end to their servitude.
...
Resolve to serve no more and you are at once freed. I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break into pieces...


Unless, of course, one prefers the serfdom, the chains, the lazyboy and the SUV, the future you have at the hands of your Master, or the "uncertain hope of living" free.

La Boetie wrote this in 1548, for these people, for us. You can find the rest here.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's called extortion. Plain and simple. Raster Oct 2012 #1
This is true! defacto7 Oct 2012 #2
It sure sounds like a threat to me. Veiled, but a threat nonetheless. calimary Oct 2012 #3
Plus it's a bogus claim bjobotts Oct 2012 #34
Voter Intimidation...State and Federal Laws.... Evasporque Oct 2012 #52
It is time to eat the 1%. With some fava beans and a nice chianti. kestrel91316 Oct 2012 #4
I don't think the side dishes are that important FiveGoodMen Oct 2012 #58
faux gras? Raster Oct 2012 #59
If the Kochs hadn't blown that giant cash wad on a losing proposition (mittens), they could afford truthisfreedom Oct 2012 #5
bingo ...n/t rsweets Oct 2012 #9
You think Mitt will lose? The Kochs have other ideas. Faygo Kid Oct 2012 #13
How many hours did you campaign for Obama yesterday? JDPriestly Oct 2012 #22
Agreed! They can only win by stealing. bjobotts Oct 2012 #35
These assholes were laying people off when bush was president. They are liars and thieves still_one Oct 2012 #6
If they are the job creators, where are the jobs? The Wielding Truth Oct 2012 #29
exactly still_one Oct 2012 #31
Here KamaAina Oct 2012 #49
It's like a protection racket daleo Oct 2012 #7
If possible, it's a new low... ailsagirl Oct 2012 #37
"If we elect candidates who want to spend hundreds of billions in borrowed money on costly new leftyohiolib Oct 2012 #8
Showing their true colors ffr Oct 2012 #10
These companies are just begging for an heavy IRS audit. Starting with top down. Panasonic Oct 2012 #11
No wonder they feel comfortable sending jobs to China.. they act as if they ARE Communist China. progressivebydesign Oct 2012 #12
Can't speak for the Kock... Koch employees... bpollen Oct 2012 #14
Grrrr.... this is getting weird. But it's the Koch Roaches and I didn't expect anything less. Initech Oct 2012 #15
You folks do realize- ruffburr Oct 2012 #16
A new low for the filthy rich. SoapBox Oct 2012 #17
A good argument for nationalizing them DBoon Oct 2012 #18
Could happen! JDPriestly Oct 2012 #23
Nationalize them, and give them $0.01 for their properties Panasonic Oct 2012 #55
The "job creators" have become too expensive and they're not "creating jobs" anywa. aletier_v Oct 2012 #19
The Election of 1896 chuckstevens Oct 2012 #20
yeah, well that was also the good old-bad robber baron days newspeak Oct 2012 #60
So Obama's re-election is going to reduce demand for Koch products? krispos42 Oct 2012 #21
it certainly reduces MY demand for their products! lastlib Oct 2012 #38
I think it is time for a change in federal law. Liberal Veteran Oct 2012 #24
Laws may have already been broken awake Oct 2012 #26
Such law exists. It's called Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Panasonic Oct 2012 #56
Well that is highly unamerican now is'nt it?? nt and-justice-for-all Oct 2012 #25
I hope the rich itch. aquart Oct 2012 #27
If Democrats hold the Senate bluestateguy Oct 2012 #28
... so many...suffer under a single tyrant who has no other power than the power they give him; jtuck004 Oct 2012 #30
They want you to think it's the John Galt strike. Turbineguy Oct 2012 #32
30.,000 drones over the U.S. lib2DaBone Oct 2012 #33
Charge them with election fraud!! lastlib Oct 2012 #36
So buying votes is legal in this country now Thrill Oct 2012 #39
Treason against hard working Americans!!!!! Pauldg47 Oct 2012 #40
The most amazing part of this is that they still think Romney can win. randome Oct 2012 #41
It must hurt to know that they wasted millions lovuian Oct 2012 #42
That's a pretty serious form of terrorism. Things like this can lead to serious violence. Zorra Oct 2012 #43
I figured this would start to get ugly in October Norbert Oct 2012 #44
x2 Smilo Oct 2012 #54
"Even my ass has standards." Brigid Oct 2012 #61
He sounds like us Democrats but in a 180 degree way. Kablooie Oct 2012 #45
Got voter intimidation? KamaAina Oct 2012 #46
I Thought BLACKMAILING was Illegal. Megahurtz Oct 2012 #47
Kick for Monday crowd. LeftinOH Oct 2012 #48
Here's a Juicy Tidbit Megahurtz Oct 2012 #50
tampering? Voter Intimidation? I think so....hello Feds!....nt Evasporque Oct 2012 #51
My boss is hinting Smilo Oct 2012 #53
Tell him to his face: BULLSHIT. Panasonic Oct 2012 #57
Fuck Koch tawadi Oct 2012 #62
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Koch Industries, other CE...»Reply #30