Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(78,249 posts)

9. Would that have justified them owning stock in South African gold mines during the apartheid era?

Tue Oct 16, 2012, 05:10 PM

Oct 2012

Thjey paid great dividends, too.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rupert Murdoch faces shareholder revolt at News Corp annual meeting [View all] alp227 Oct 2012 OP

New day same old Wellstone ruled Oct 2012 #1

They 've not got sufficient voting stock to achieve anything. dipsydoodle Oct 2012 #2

That is the first thing I though pennylane100 Oct 2012 #3

News Corporation Shareholders Meeting: Much Ado Might Not Add Up to Much dipsydoodle Oct 2012 #4

Rupert Murdoch at News Corp AGM - live coverage dipsydoodle Oct 2012 #5

Why on Earth does CalPERS own News Corp. stock in the first place? KamaAina Oct 2012 #7

Substantial dividends is probably the simple answer to that. dipsydoodle Oct 2012 #8

They may well have done. dipsydoodle Oct 2012 #11

Couldn't happen to a nastier man. lindysalsagal Oct 2012 #6

News Corp shareholders are revolting The Second Stone Oct 2012 #10

Rupert Murdoch faces down shareholders at News Corp's AGM dipsydoodle Oct 2012 #12

Good, but doubt that it will go very far LeftishBrit Oct 2012 #13