Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

magicarpet

(19,045 posts)
5. Wonderful approach,... freeze him out of any further office of public trust,...
Thu Feb 18, 2021, 10:39 AM
Feb 2021

.... then civil & criminal litigation until he is destitute, bankrupt, and confined to prison.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

OK, get on it, Jamie! lastlib Feb 2021 #1
Do it. Now! NCjack Feb 2021 #21
If it only requires a simple majority - go for it! lark Feb 2021 #2
"if it requires 2/3 to convict". Or wait till 2022 and see if we have 2/3's... mitch96 Feb 2021 #9
I like your dream. lark Feb 2021 #26
FORMER president, political wire. niyad Feb 2021 #3
This should definitely be pursued. lagomorph777 Feb 2021 #4
Wonderful approach,... freeze him out of any further office of public trust,... magicarpet Feb 2021 #5
It would require a conviction in court first. NYC Liberal Feb 2021 #6
no where in the language of section 3 does it say anything about courts or a conviction. bullimiami Feb 2021 #7
+1 I can't find anything about courts in there. lagomorph777 Feb 2021 #12
Cool. So next time the Republicans control both houses they can NYC Liberal Feb 2021 #17
impeachment is one thing. a14s3 is totally separate. unless or until the court "interprets" it bullimiami Feb 2021 #22
not necessarily dsc Feb 2021 #8
The Constitution is really vague on that section melm00se Feb 2021 #15
The Republicans could have banned Hillary from office on the pretext of "BENGHAZI!!1" NYC Liberal Feb 2021 #18
without a doubt they could have tried, and it would been challenged and gone through the courts. bullimiami Feb 2021 #23
and challenged melm00se Feb 2021 #30
Does not apply to presidents. marie999 Feb 2021 #10
DOJ seems to disagree. lagomorph777 Feb 2021 #13
So the DOJ disagrees with the Chief Justice. marie999 Feb 2021 #14
Interesting tension. "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office..." lagomorph777 Feb 2021 #27
If the 14th Amendment is used, marie999 Feb 2021 #28
I hope you're right. lagomorph777 Feb 2021 #29
I found another Supreme Court case that shows, marie999 Feb 2021 #31
That was my reading of it too bucolic_frolic Feb 2021 #11
Make it happen LiberalFighter Feb 2021 #16
It sounds like Raskin is suggesting criminal charges for Chump? FakeNoose Feb 2021 #19
i would think a conviction is a dropkick for the 14th. bullimiami Feb 2021 #24
Would that mean McConnell could put his money where his mouth is this time, Bayard Feb 2021 #20
He'll be banned by not being able to get enough VOTES. oldsoftie Feb 2021 #25
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Raskin Says Trump Could S...»Reply #5