Latest Breaking News

dixiegrrrrl

(60,161 posts)

36. The OP is reporting a movie that is being planned.

Thu Oct 18, 2012, 08:31 AM

Oct 2012

And no where in the OP is there any discussion of " 9/11 death rays or holograms" which is in the TOS.

Whether the OP about a planned movie with big name actors meets all the criteria for LBN is a job for the forum host to decide.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

147 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Martin Sheen and Woody Harrelson set for 9/11 'truther' film September Morn [View all] corksean Oct 2012 OP

It's about time DollarBillHines Oct 2012 #1

Yeah but it's ridiculous because the election will be over before the film is cast. truthisfreedom Oct 2012 #2

There should be some light shown on this... DollarBillHines Oct 2012 #4

You want to drag 9/11 into a close election? hack89 Oct 2012 #37

Why would it matter? Ter Oct 2012 #50

I'm glad they're doing this film & hope it's a big hit. ~nt 99th_Monkey Oct 2012 #3

Myself, I've aays thought that MIHOP was a plot to discredit the more plausible LIHOP n/t eridani Oct 2012 #5

+1 harun Oct 2012 #55

So glad to see this... AnotherDreamWeaver Oct 2012 #6

Cool. Hopefully it's done properly. MrSlayer Oct 2012 #7

I don't like the way D.H. worded this...but anything martin & ed are in, I see. graham4anything Oct 2012 #8

Whatever happened, the bush-cheney crew were at the Cha Oct 2012 #9

+1 CrispyQ Oct 2012 #64

I think a lot of us 10%ers were Cha Oct 2012 #84

i have to say, the writer and director do not have many great credits under their belt Tunkamerica Oct 2012 #10

This could be their breakthrough movie. StarryNite Oct 2012 #11

Sorry to be ignorant but what are MIHOP and LIHOP? dballance Oct 2012 #12

Made it happen on purpose/let it happen on purpose cali Oct 2012 #15

Thanks. I was wondering too. Chemisse Oct 2012 #19

One thing I certainly hope they address: The Doctor. Oct 2012 #13

There are some 9/11 Truthers who question nano-thermite hack89 Oct 2012 #41

Hahahahaaaa! The Doctor. Oct 2012 #73

I am not saying anything - merely quoting a Truther hack89 Oct 2012 #78

Nice try. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #89

No - he is saying that nanothermite has no high explosive properties hack89 Oct 2012 #92

Again, nice wordplay. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #97

So what was flinging massive girders and beams in the air? hack89 Oct 2012 #100

Good questions. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #108

Well, why can't YOU tell me? hack89 Oct 2012 #114

Your game has wound to a finish here.... The Doctor. Oct 2012 #116

At least you have a lifetime hobby hack89 Oct 2012 #119

Explain the presence of nano-thermite in the debris. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #121

It was paint chips. hack89 Oct 2012 #123

You know that's a lie. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #129

Read my link again - you don't appear to understand what it actually said. nt hack89 Oct 2012 #141

I read what you said. That's all I needed to read. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #145

The unimaginable crime so heinous no one will ever want to admit it happened. gordianot Oct 2012 #14

Alex Jones would be proud of this, that crackpot Suji to Seoul Oct 2012 #16

You're so right there cpwm17 Oct 2012 #20

I agree! SkyDaddy7 Oct 2012 #26

+1000 Adenoid_Hynkel Oct 2012 #39

evidence procopia Oct 2012 #58

Get ready for all involved to be smeared by Fox News. Democratopia Oct 2012 #17

Yes Berlum Oct 2012 #18

Great, now we can find out how 9-11 really went down. cpwm17 Oct 2012 #21

your post: just your opinion or propaganda? Raster Oct 2012 #23

It's impossible to answer questions asked by the scientifically illiterate cpwm17 Oct 2012 #25

At least you can somewhat understand it with creationists Major Nikon Oct 2012 #59

LMAO! The Doctor. Oct 2012 #76

Visit the Creative Speculation group and you can go into detail cpwm17 Oct 2012 #86

Awesome. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #93

We already know what happened! SkyDaddy7 Oct 2012 #27

no one said anything about bush*, who was nothing more than a moronic figurehead... Raster Oct 2012 #30

LIHOP does not require competence (n/t) thesquanderer Oct 2012 #31

LIHOP only requires that they don't do jack shit... Frank Cannon Oct 2012 #33

Yet CD, holograms, mini-nukes and other woo are the face of 9/11 Truth hack89 Oct 2012 #43

No, those are deliberate bullshit painted ON to the 'face' of the skeptics. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #74

Tell you what - go to a Truther site and denounce CD. hack89 Oct 2012 #79

False equivalence. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #91

So a 757 really hit the Pentagon? Good. hack89 Oct 2012 #96

It was likely a plane. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #102

Except for all the 757 parts and all those eye witnesses that saw a 757 at close range you mean. nt hack89 Oct 2012 #104

Why do you think that air space is highly protected? hack89 Oct 2012 #107

Really? The Doctor. Oct 2012 #109

Because that has happened so many times since it was built in 1942? hack89 Oct 2012 #112

Yet the WTC "demolition" was conducted with unconventional materials hack89 Oct 2012 #98

Wow, you've had a great deal of practice with the word games. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #105

Yet you cannot explain in any detail how it was done hack89 Oct 2012 #110

I wasn't there. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #113

What has the entire 9/11 Truth movement been doing for 11 years? hack89 Oct 2012 #115

Repeat a lie often enough, eh? The Doctor. Oct 2012 #120

It was paint chips. hack89 Oct 2012 #122

Yes, there were ALSO paint chips. Those were tested as well as the nano-thermite. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #133

Read my link again - you don't appear to understand what it actually said. nt hack89 Oct 2012 #140

I don't care about your link, I asked YOU The Doctor. Oct 2012 #146

No "Truther" has ever given a PLAUSIBLE explanation on how 9-11 went down cpwm17 Oct 2012 #125

Your ignorance of the explanations and their plausibility The Doctor. Oct 2012 #128

Visit the Creative Speculation group and you can present your evidence cpwm17 Oct 2012 #131

That burden has been met. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #132

You repeatidly assert that nano-thermite was found in the debris. cpwm17 Oct 2012 #138

Here ya go: The Doctor. Oct 2012 #144

What hasn't been established is the claim that it was intentional negligence Bradical79 Oct 2012 #45

Bingo. Besides, it should be obvious to anyone that something like this... OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #42

It's a work of fiction, as per the article. LanternWaste Oct 2012 #81

The line "It's a work of fiction" is not in the article cpwm17 Oct 2012 #90

Long overdue. If nothing else, the sequence of events & actions by bush*, cheney* and rumsfeld*... Raster Oct 2012 #22

I invite you to speculate creatively on this in the appropriate forum - Creative Speculation. n/t Bolo Boffin Oct 2012 #24

It isn't speculation, and this is the appropriate forum. Moosepoop Oct 2012 #28

I refer you to the Terms of Service, and 9/11 Truth is most definitely speculation. Bolo Boffin Oct 2012 #29

thanks for posting the board rules-indeed the last sentences on anti-semitism is correct graham4anything Oct 2012 #32

You can't vote. Skee Oct 2012 #34

We know a lot about the voting machines, that's the problem ;-) I see what you're saying though. Bradical79 Oct 2012 #49

The OP is reporting a movie that is being planned. dixiegrrrrl Oct 2012 #36

9/11 death rays or holograms cannot even be discussed in the Creative Speculation forum. Bolo Boffin Oct 2012 #63

I think there is a precise and relevant difference between LanternWaste Oct 2012 #82

"Important news of national interest only." Bolo Boffin Oct 2012 #88

If you're one step ahead of the crowd, you're a genius ... Eddie Haskell Oct 2012 #48

Nice! Raster Oct 2012 #56

That's true in so many different contexts, it's not even funny. Poll_Blind Oct 2012 #66

D*mn! RobinA Oct 2012 #80

"Truther" is an unfortunate label for something deeply serious DeeDeeNY Oct 2012 #35

Thank you for this post....i lost friends on 9/11 and feel very strongly that we have not been given Pachamama Oct 2012 #40

A very appropriate label for those who support CD, no-planes and mini-nukes hack89 Oct 2012 #44

the opposite of a "Truther" green for victory Oct 2012 #65

Do Creationists question how man got here? cpwm17 Oct 2012 #99

Maybe they can make it a double feature with a birther film Adenoid_Hynkel Oct 2012 #38

And have a cartoon about climate denial in the middle. grantcart Oct 2012 #118

MIGHT be interesting... Bradical79 Oct 2012 #46

There needs to be an independent investigation. Eddie Haskell Oct 2012 #47

By who? Who has the capability, independence and credibility to do it? hack89 Oct 2012 #51

Bullshit Eddie Haskell Oct 2012 #52

I think you need to reread NIST - they proposed a detailed collapse mechanism for WTC 7. hack89 Oct 2012 #53

The flights were already being tracked on radar before the transponders were turned off. Eddie Haskell Oct 2012 #126

You still have not said who should do this investigation. hack89 Oct 2012 #54

2. Turning off transponders does not take an aircraft off radar. Major Nikon Oct 2012 #62

Most of those needles you refer to have tiny signatures, CRH Oct 2012 #67

Wrong Major Nikon Oct 2012 #69

Glad somebody here knows what they're talking about TrogL Oct 2012 #77

Is this to say then our military jets radar, ... CRH Oct 2012 #111

Military aircraft are absolutely dependent on transponders. hack89 Oct 2012 #117

What you are saying is ludicrous, ... CRH Oct 2012 #130

You can track him. You can't identify him. hack89 Oct 2012 #139

Fantastic! k&r! wildbilln864 Oct 2012 #57

Show me credible evidence, ... CRH Oct 2012 #60

hard for me to believe that anyone could watch a video of the buildings collapsing and not olddad56 Oct 2012 #71

The same old logical fallacy TrogL Oct 2012 #75

Massive weight and gravity doesn't leave falling buildings many options. hack89 Oct 2012 #83

That was the second thing that caught my attention that day, ... CRH Oct 2012 #127

The precise timing allows for a neat collapse. cpwm17 Oct 2012 #134

They fell in their footprints, enough said, won't waste my time with you. CRH Oct 2012 #135

"They fell in their footprints" It only take a few moments on Goggle to discredit that claim. cpwm17 Oct 2012 #143

There is no evidence of the plane that hit the Pentagon cpwm17 Oct 2012 #85

Self-delete due to emotional reaction to tragic loss that affected my own family slackmaster Oct 2012 #95

I assume you misunderstood my post at first. nt cpwm17 Oct 2012 #103

Yes I did. I read the first sentence and my mind went into full rage mode. slackmaster Oct 2012 #106

My brother is a Naval officer. He knew people who DIED in the attack on the Pentagon. slackmaster Oct 2012 #101

Great! nt valerief Oct 2012 #61

I pray someday the truth will out, and it will set us all free. joanbarnes Oct 2012 #68

One thing I can't get over: Arugula Latte Oct 2012 #70

and how long had the goverment had a plan on the books for a false flag atack fo this nature? olddad56 Oct 2012 #124

The US government under George Bush's administration used 9/11/2001, Ashgrey77 Oct 2012 #72

The fact that they used 9/11 as a pretense to do all the shit they were planning to do anyway hughee99 Oct 2012 #87

Rec because I expect the movie to be unintentionally hilarious slackmaster Oct 2012 #94

Spoiler: they're gonna fuck it up with aliens. Robb Oct 2012 #136

...And they wake up at the same time to a clock radio playing "I've Got You Babe" repeatedly slackmaster Oct 2012 #142

Good and bad JesseJonesNYC Oct 2012 #137

Sorry, Locking this thread OKNancy Oct 2012 #147