Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 91 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»High court won't make una...»Reply #2
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

In reply to the discussion: High court won't make unanimous jury requirement retroactive [View all]

cstanleytech

(26,290 posts)
2. I can kind of understand it as it would literally overwhelm the court system if that was required.
Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Mon May 17, 2021, 04:42 PM
May 2021

Sucks for those in prison but hopefully if they are innocent they can find other avenues of appeal to win their freedom.

TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
High court won't make unanimous jury requirement retroactive [View all] BumRushDaShow May 2021 OP
So when I read something like this, it is yet another reminder of the false justice promoted by ShazamIam May 2021 #1
Worth noting that the states can still implement some kind of procedure to revisit these cases. thesquanderer May 2021 #4
I can kind of understand it as it would literally overwhelm the court system if that was required. cstanleytech May 2021 #2
It is indeed complicated. If the crime occurred many years ago... thesquanderer May 2021 #5
A signal they are moving on from precedent bucolic_frolic May 2021 #3
What precedent are you thinking of? FBaggins May 2021 #7
The most interesting thing is one of last lines............... DENVERPOPS May 2021 #6
Most states require unanimous verdicts. Calista241 May 2021 #8
Thx Calista NC DENVERPOPS May 2021 #13
So is this good or bad? Polybius May 2021 #9
Meant to add a link to the ruling BumRushDaShow May 2021 #10
Ugh, so it's bad Polybius May 2021 #11
Well it seems they refused to follow past precedent BumRushDaShow May 2021 #12
That's the allegation, but it doesn't appear to be a particularly strong one FBaggins May 2021 #15
Not really FBaggins May 2021 #14
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»High court won't make una...»Reply #2
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.