Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

forgotmylogin

(7,527 posts)
10. He just can't be charged with that specific crime is what I'm inferring.
Thu Jun 3, 2021, 11:48 PM
Jun 2021

They're not saying he's not guilty of accessing records inappropriately, just that he can't be charged specifically with the crime "Computer Fraud and Abuse" since he had access to the records and didn't commit fraud nor abuse to obtain them. It's an understandable technicality.

Most companies make you take lots of training and sign documents saying that an employee won't access records they have access to for non company-use. That's how the employee is in the wrong and should be disciplined.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. Supreme Court limits...»Reply #10