Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(172,634 posts)
28. But you miss one thing
Fri Jul 23, 2021, 02:06 PM
Jul 2021

and the trends are established in those data points for when the Rule suddenly skyrocketed into use.

I.e., you had a bunch of RW loons elected in 2010, and more each successive 2 years (in both chambers) who then proceeded to execute a plan that was essentially to block anything that Obama put forth - whether legislation recommendations or appointments.

So in your scenario (where we controlled the Presidency) -

If you control the House and they control the Senate... you just vote it down in the House. You don't filibuster.


it misses one initial reality where there were actually "swing state" representatives in the (R) House between 2010 and 2018 (around 25 or so), who made up enough votes to actually pass "bipartisan" legislation there to supplement almost all the (D) votes, and then send it to the then-(D) Senate (which was only (D)-controlled until 2014), where it was promptly filibustered by the GOP.

So the party may have "opposed it" but did not have enough "control" over all of their members to kill it before it moved from the House. And thus filibustering (cloture) meaning it never gets to to the point where it could even be "voted down", because it never makes it past the procedural vote, even if it is put on the schedule by a (D) Senate Majority Leader.

With the all-GOP setup (including the Presidency) that only lasted 2 years (2017 - 2018), the filibustering did commence by (D)s, which is what prompted the GOP to use reconciliation for an egregious piece of legislation - the tax cuts for billionaires that passed with a simple majority in the Senate in 2017.

After that, there was not much else left (other than non-controversial stuff) that actually got done and went unscathed through Congress, after which Democrats took the House in 2018 and changed the dynamic.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't get it. ancianita Jul 2021 #1
I think it boils down to BumRushDaShow Jul 2021 #3
The problem (or not really)... LiberatedUSA Jul 2021 #4
Well there is also a differential BumRushDaShow Jul 2021 #5
WHAT 'GOP platform' ? DemocraticPatriot Jul 2021 #26
How often did the Dems use the filibuster when they were in the minority? How about the GQP? LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jul 2021 #11
Even the threat of the filibuster stopped the GOP. Calista241 Jul 2021 #14
Thank you. That puts the issue in better focus for me. nt LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jul 2021 #15
Well the GOP took over the Senate in January 2014, and then the "fun" began BumRushDaShow Jul 2021 #16
Lots of data points... but misses the bigger picture FBaggins Jul 2021 #27
But you miss one thing BumRushDaShow Jul 2021 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jul 2021 #12
But that doesn't make sense . . . . markpkessinger Jul 2021 #21
I have a feeling BumRushDaShow Jul 2021 #25
McConnell and the Rs would dump the fillibuster Deminpenn Jul 2021 #29
Exactly BumRushDaShow Jul 2021 #31
If Democrats do the right things for the people, republicans will not win again, keeping the Escurumbele Jul 2021 #17
As opposed to what's happening now? Miguelito Loveless Jul 2021 #2
well in fairness TFG just used EOs Voltaire2 Jul 2021 #7
Damned if we do. OneCrazyDiamond Jul 2021 #6
POORLY WRITTEN HEADLINE!!!!!! They're taking Pres. Biden somewhat out of context. groundloop Jul 2021 #8
you are right - that distinction is important to point out samsingh Jul 2021 #18
If The Democrats Think... GB_RN Jul 2021 #9
Filibuster was supposed to encourage both sides to hear one another bucolic_frolic Jul 2021 #10
There was a supermajority requirement under the Articles of Confederation . . . . markpkessinger Jul 2021 #23
You're correct bucolic_frolic Jul 2021 #24
interesting headline... stillcool Jul 2021 #13
okay, then fine. make it a real filibuster rather than this bullshit we currently have. Javaman Jul 2021 #19
What would the GOP do if tables were turned? End it immediately. Dems are too damn nice IMHO. Evolve Dammit Jul 2021 #20
That makes no sense to me at all. Joe has got himself mired in the fantasy of bipartisanship. Vinca Jul 2021 #22
The exact opposite would happen Deminpenn Jul 2021 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Biden: 'Nothing at all wi...»Reply #28