Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lexw

(804 posts)
55. I think what's nuts here....
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 07:36 PM
Oct 2012

is that these skeletons keeping pouring out of the R$'s closet, but a lot of people are still voting for him!!!!! (insert more !)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good. Let's see what they say. mac56 Oct 2012 #1
That will come later formercia Oct 2012 #2
Meanwhile, her client will probably get a decent settlement. JDPriestly Oct 2012 #41
She has no chance naaman fletcher Oct 2012 #57
Actually, whether she did or didn't know if the Judge would lift her client's gag order Texin Oct 2012 #19
Mitt: "...doesn't care...he has nothing to hide." KansDem Oct 2012 #3
here's hoping the IRS takes note - my hunch is R$ is hiding a co's net worth to benefit himself, not wordpix Oct 2012 #4
I am grievously disappointed in the conspicuous lack of pics of the "hot judge" slackmaster Oct 2012 #5
I do want to know more about that myself. TreasonousBastard Oct 2012 #10
I kind of skimmed the article, but I didn't notice even the GENDER of the judge being mentioned slackmaster Oct 2012 #12
Jennifer Ulwick onenote Oct 2012 #14
Awww... c'mon. Attractive enough but... TreasonousBastard Oct 2012 #17
Hot? She looks like Greta in her early days, before the surgery. progressivebydesign Oct 2012 #43
Her jaw isn't jutting out like a pugilist WCGreen Oct 2012 #52
I am from the L.A. area... Hepburn Oct 2012 #6
I always wondered how well she did for her clients... TreasonousBastard Oct 2012 #11
Yep, real boneheaded move OkieGranny Oct 2012 #15
Retired CA atty as well. broadcaster75201 Oct 2012 #18
I will NEVER forget making an objection in case where GA was on the other side... Hepburn Oct 2012 #58
I'm NOT an atty and even I thought that was bad. progressoid Oct 2012 #23
GA is to the legal profession nichomachus Oct 2012 #24
Perhaps Aldred didn't want her client un-gagged formercia Oct 2012 #35
If that was the case, why ask to have it ungagged? onenote Oct 2012 #36
because we want the dirt on Mitt ThomThom Oct 2012 #61
Exactly....so the "no comment" still works. Hepburn Oct 2012 #62
Strategic in my view. Whether her client stays silent depends on the judge JDPriestly Oct 2012 #42
Not really... Hepburn Oct 2012 #59
Is it possible that she did it on purpose? JohnnyRingo Oct 2012 #56
See above... Hepburn Oct 2012 #60
Gloria cant speak out. But the GLOBE has the record and comparison with stock records of time. CarmanK Oct 2012 #7
But if the stock prices DO corroborate Romney's story... slackmaster Oct 2012 #8
Question ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2012 #13
If there is a contradiction between Romney's testimony in court and the papers JDPriestly Oct 2012 #44
Yup ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2012 #49
worth the risk but if that were the case one would think there would be no reason to keep leftyohiolib Oct 2012 #21
Staples hadn't gone public yet. And Romney reportedly said in court that it could go bankrupt at highplainsdem Oct 2012 #16
Correction - a new Boston Globe story says this is about Romney's testimony after the divorce: highplainsdem Oct 2012 #22
How can it be perjury? ryan_cats Oct 2012 #20
that is what I also understand texasmomof3 Oct 2012 #25
He was considered an expert witness nichomachus Oct 2012 #26
How would you prove he knew it was a lie, a psychic? ryan_cats Oct 2012 #28
I think the point is that you can't give testimony to something you'll benefit from later. nt progressivebydesign Oct 2012 #45
If Romney signed a paper saying one thing about the company and offered that JDPriestly Oct 2012 #46
If that is the case then. ryan_cats Oct 2012 #50
Agreed, that's the problem. This "nothing" story is going to push more valubale fodder SlimJimmy Oct 2012 #48
likewise, Rmoney can't make his case against what the record says. uncle ray Oct 2012 #27
More details here, live-tweeted by a Boston Phoenix reporter, David Bernstein: highplainsdem Oct 2012 #9
Transcripts anyone? littlemissmartypants Oct 2012 #29
! BumRushDaShow Oct 2012 #31
It's probably for the best - Gloria makes most folks cringe Adenoid_Hynkel Oct 2012 #30
Speak for yourself. WinkyDink Oct 2012 #40
She makes me cringe ChillZilla Oct 2012 #51
I think the Globe was looking for something specific riverwalker Oct 2012 #32
Any news outlets other than TMZ and Boston Globe picking this up? Turborama Oct 2012 #33
The point is Rmoney was saying one thing in court and another Sedona Oct 2012 #34
If this is a transcript of a hearing that occurred after the stock went public onenote Oct 2012 #37
A publicly traded company has continuing reporting obligations to the SEC and to the public. Jim Lane Oct 2012 #54
Could be that they are not that interested in Romney's testimony but rather JDPriestly Oct 2012 #47
BuzzFeed has a story on part of the transcript, what Romney said about Staples. highplainsdem Oct 2012 #38
"the hot judge"? WinkyDink Oct 2012 #39
I thought Allred crossed her T's & dotted her I's Cherchez la Femme Oct 2012 #53
I think what's nuts here.... lexw Oct 2012 #55
Define "soar" - Staples didn't even hit $6 til 1996 TexasBushwhacker Oct 2012 #63
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Mitt Romney -- Judge UNSE...»Reply #55