Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Mitt says he pays close to 15 percent rate [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)22. That jerk pays a lower rate than I do--and no one asks ME to speak!
What's up with that?
I am surrounded by four other people right now. I've added up their salaries, and included mine, and we still can't reach Rmoney's "pin money speaker's fee" amount.
Talk about out of touch!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"below that of middle-class workers, which would also include military servicemembers."
kpete
Jan 2012
#15
It's a bizarre contruct..."Since I didn't really EARN the money, it shouldn't be taxed as much."
Atman
Jan 2012
#17
It is even more skewed than that. 15% is the tax rate on dividends and capital gains.
Fool Count
Jan 2012
#34
Yet, it is probably the only part of his income that incurred 35% income tax.
Fool Count
Jan 2012
#33
I think what he meant was the $360K is not much compared to his investment income...
Southerner
Jan 2012
#16
"And then I get speakers fees from time to time, but not very much.” ($300,000/yr)
yellowcanine
Jan 2012
#23
BUT, how many of your buddies are going to say, "I WANT TO PAY THAT RATE TOO!'
CTyankee
Jan 2012
#35
He genuinely seems to believe that people with less wealth than himself mustn't be
anAustralianobserver
Jan 2012
#38