Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(170,175 posts)
19. The request already violates the state law
Sat Sep 18, 2021, 05:24 PM
Sep 2021

Per the letter that 2 members of Congress sent to DOJ as posted here - https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=2801983

Where they have a footnote to this statement -

While Pennsylvania's election code provides that a public information list containing the name, address, date of birth and voting history of voters can be publicly accessed, it does not provide for access to sensitive and private information such as a voter's driver's license number and portions of social security numbers. 4


And the footnote references -

4 Pa. Code § 1404


Which is this -

Pennsylvania Statutes Title 25 Pa.C.S.A. Elections § 1404. Public information lists

Current as of January 01, 2019 | Updated by FindLaw Staff
Search Pennsylvania Statutes

Search by Keyword or Citation

« Prev
Next »

(a) Establishment.--

(1) A commission shall provide for computer inquiries concerning individual registered electors.  With respect to each registered elector who is the subject of an inquiry, the information provided shall contain the name, address, date of birth and voting history.  Upon request, the commission shall supply a printed record for each such elector subject to the provisions of this part.  In addition, the commission may make available for inspection a printed or computerized public information list containing the name, address, date of birth and voting history of each registered elector in the county.

(2) The list may also include information on voting districts.

(3) The list may not contain the digitized or electronic signature or SURE registration number of the registered elector.

(b) Access.--

(1) The secretary may promulgate reasonable regulations governing access to the list.

(2) No individual inspecting the list may tamper with or alter it.

(3) No individual who inspects the list or who acquires names of registered electors from the list may use information contained in the list for purposes unrelated to elections, political activities or law enforcement.  Before inspecting the list or obtaining names of registered electors or other information from the list, the individual must provide identification to the public official having custody of the public information list and must state in writing that any information obtained from the list will not be used for purposes unrelated to elections, political activities or law enforcement.

(c) Copies.--

(1) The commission shall provide paper copies of the public information lists and may provide copies in some other form to any registered elector in this Commonwealth within ten days of receiving a written request accompanied by payment of the cost of reproduction and postage.  The cost of the copies shall be determined by the office providing copies.

(2) An individual who inspects or acquires a copy of a public information list may not use any information contained in it for purposes unrelated to elections, political activities or law enforcement.

https://codes.findlaw.com/pa/title-25-pacsa-elections/pa-csa-sect-25-1404.html


Nothing in there about "social security number" or "driver's license number". So I expect this will be part of what is in the lawsuit filed in the State court (where the state Supreme Court is 5 (D) - 2 (R)).

I am still reading through the lawsuit that the PA State Senate Democrats filed - it's 178 pages I don't think the SCOTUS would need to weigh in on it since it can be litigated as a violation of state law. However Democrats can counter in the federal courts if they cite the VRA, but I suppose they may want to get an injunction/stay in state court first before proceeding to federal court.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R! SheltieLover Sep 2021 #1
Glad to see it BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #2
Me too! SheltieLover Sep 2021 #5
WE,,,,, Cryptoad Sep 2021 #3
If the information is private, glad they are suing, but in Ohio, it isn't Marthe48 Sep 2021 #4
Much of the info is already public record BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #6
I'd be more worried about the fraudit purveyors cleaning out my bank account Marthe48 Sep 2021 #9
2 Democratic Cngresswomen have already sent letters to the DOJ to investigate BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #12
I saw the responses, glad someone is acting Marthe48 Sep 2021 #22
Definitely a legitimate worry. ShazzieB Sep 2021 #13
Shapiro sums it up nicely in his interview with Anderson Cooper... ShazzieB Sep 2021 #11
I just posted this above BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #14
They want the voter information to gerrymander districts. gab13by13 Sep 2021 #7
"Where is our DOJ?" BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #8
do this include all documents on all government people & info ? monkeyman1 Sep 2021 #16
The light of truth on the lie of their motives is "or we can dispel a lot of concerns" bucolic_frolic Sep 2021 #10
Well when you have the President Pro-Tempore of the PA State Senate going all-in BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #15
"legislative authority to oversee executive branch functions" CaptainTruth Sep 2021 #17
take it to the Supreme Court , but that's a lost fucking cause ! monkeyman1 Sep 2021 #18
The request already violates the state law BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #19
holy shit ! monkeyman1 Sep 2021 #20
LOL BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #23
back at ya! monkeyman1 Sep 2021 #24
These Neo Nazi's need to be stopped NOW or witness the end of the Republic . Damn them to HELL . Dam geretogo Sep 2021 #21
there getting ready to go back underground ! they don't have choice ! monkeyman1 Sep 2021 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author ExTex Sep 2021 #26
The GQP in fact does control the language, gab13by13 Sep 2021 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author ExTex Sep 2021 #28
The demanded information will be given to an unspecified private company for an unspecified purpose LastLiberal in PalmSprings Sep 2021 #29
I expect BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pennsylvania Democrats su...»Reply #19