Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(169,490 posts)
15. I haven't delved into the draft completely
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 05:16 PM
Sep 2021

but you saw what happened this year with the "mask" fines - https://apnews.com/article/health-government-and-politics-coronavirus-pandemic-eae783d8a8abf94fbb1e0d78061b3ebb

and refusal to go through security fines (now up to 6 GOP douchebags) - https://thehill.com/homenews/house/569768-sixth-house-gop-lawmaker-issued-5k-metal-detector-fine

and even Biden had TSA double the fines on disruptive passengers on planes - https://www.npr.org/2021/09/10/1035877886/tsa-doubles-fines-airline-airplane-flying-mask-mandates-biden

So Democrats are playing more hardball and those fines can't be paid out of their campaign funds.

The NYT had a copy of the 174 pages here (PDF) - https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/protecting-our-democracy-act-bill-text/57a504843f8e00e0/full.pdf

They also had a section-by-section summary here (PDF) - https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/poda-section-by-section/bf37bfd1ef12f3b7/full.pdf

Scanning through the draft, for example I see this related to the Emoluments -

SEC.306.ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS

" (A) issue administrative fines to individuals for violations;

" (B) order individuals to take corrective action, including disgorgement, divestiture, and recusal, as

the Director deems necessary; and

‘‘ (C) bring civil actions to enforce such fines

and orders.’’.


Scanning through more, it looks like it is doing revisions to parts of a bunch of different laws. For example I saw this from the NYT summary -

DIVISION C–DEFENDING ELECTIONS AGAINST FOREIGN INTERFERENCE

TITLE XIII–REPORTING FOREIGN INTERFERENCE IN ELECTIONS


(snip)

Section 1303. Criminal Penalties. Section 1303 amends the Federal Election Campaign Act to include penalties such that anyone who knowingly and willfully commits a violation these provisions shall be fined not more than $500,000, imprisoned not more than five years,or both. Further provides that anyone who knowingly and willfully conceals or destroys materials relating to a reportable foreign contact is to be fined not more than $1,000,000, imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

GOPers will oppose this proposal. They have no interest in curtailing presidential power. n/t Eyeball_Kid Sep 2021 #1
Only when a Republican is in office... ColinC Sep 2021 #13
Thank you Dems & Speaker Pelosi Budi Sep 2021 #2
We just have to be careful here dsc Sep 2021 #3
That is in reference to BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #5
We are crazy for clipping our wings when the Democratic Party is in power. Politicub Sep 2021 #4
Did you look at what was included in the legislation? BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #6
I did read the article, and I think the intent of the law is noble. Politicub Sep 2021 #8
Agree that this could be ripe for Constitutional challenges BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #12
Constitutional amendments manicdem Sep 2021 #16
I don't think many of the provisions should need constitutional amendments Politicub Sep 2021 #17
What are the penalties for violating... Mawspam2 Sep 2021 #14
I haven't delved into the draft completely BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author PoliticAverse Sep 2021 #18
"The legislation specifically calls for prohibiting self-pardons by the president" - useless... PoliticAverse Sep 2021 #19
"If a President tried to pardon themself it's be up to the Supreme Court to decide" BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #21
And then what happens with the next GOP Pres & Senate? oldsoftie Sep 2021 #11
I'm sure this bill with quickly pass just like infrastructure, protecting voting rights, helping FSogol Sep 2021 #7
Okay, but then Congress has to step up and... Mawspam2 Sep 2021 #9
Problem is legislation can be thrown out by the courts so if cstanleytech Sep 2021 #10
Legislation that wasn't needed until reckless crooks took over Marthe48 Sep 2021 #20
This is so necessary SouthernDem4ever Sep 2021 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House Democrats unveil le...»Reply #15