Progressive Democrats Succeed in Removing $1 Billion Iron Dome Funding From Bill

[Beastly Boy]

96. You are supposed to cite sources that support your point, not debunk it.

The source says, in part: "The message after the war is Israel’s air defenses may one day not be enough to hinder volumes of rockets. Israel won’t admit this, but there is a strategic peak for this technology."

Pay attention to "may", "one day" and "strategic peak".

The author counters your opinion that "It's a failing system that there's no point in continuing to subsidize" with a description of resounding success of the system. Not a single mention that the system had failed in any respect. He proposes that Iron Dome has reached the limit of its effectiveness and suggests that one day it may not be enough. Bit that's the case with any military technology, at any time, in any context

He also confirms the number of rockets fired by Hamas to be over 4300, as well as the 90% rate of success.

And if you suspect your source of lying, why use it in the first place? You are shooting yourself in the foot even before you begin to defend your opinions.

I am not impressed in the least bit.