Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He'll need the equivalent of "witness protection"... NurseJackie Sep 2021 #1
I hope Jodie foster is protected from this lunatic jimfields33 Sep 2021 #3
I'm sure he'll be monitored. NurseJackie Sep 2021 #5
Let's hope. I don't know why he needs released. jimfields33 Sep 2021 #6
Because he served his sentence and is no longer considered to be a threat? NurseJackie Sep 2021 #7
We'll see. I guess time will tell. jimfields33 Sep 2021 #10
Yes, it will. NurseJackie Sep 2021 #12
I'd think Jodie Foster is still 'horrified' bigtree Sep 2021 #13
Okay. Has she explored her legal options? Can she insist that he be locked away... NurseJackie Sep 2021 #14
no, her fears don't override the court decision bigtree Sep 2021 #15
What legal justification is there for keeping him locked up? NurseJackie Sep 2021 #16
hard to say from here :sarcasm: bigtree Sep 2021 #17
I'm sure they've considered everything. NurseJackie Sep 2021 #18
what a strange way to describe concerns about a convicted murderer being released 'unconditionally' bigtree Sep 2021 #27
I'm honest enough to call it what it is and not take myself too seriously. NurseJackie Sep 2021 #28
never disagreed with a judge's decision? bigtree Sep 2021 #29
He's being treated fairly. NurseJackie Sep 2021 #30
This has been under consideration since 2016. And his mother has since died. Rhiannon12866 Sep 2021 #40
Everyone in the community he lives in knows about him underpants Sep 2021 #8
WHAT Reagan cultists? brooklynite Sep 2021 #33
Lunatic Reagan cultists who overlap a lot w anti-Bush tRumpanzees & anti-Clinton cultists: Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2021 #34
Post removed Post removed Sep 2021 #2
That is a little harsh. Ray Bruns Sep 2021 #4
I can only imagine what that post said...... oldsoftie Sep 2021 #25
Well, there's nothing more I need (or want) to learn from you . . . Journeyman Sep 2021 #11
This is like Sirhan Sirhan iemanja Sep 2021 #9
Exactly. JohnSJ Sep 2021 #21
One was found guility Sgent Sep 2021 #41
No. Dawson Leery Sep 2021 #19
OK, I guess. maxsolomon Sep 2021 #20
mom is dead, July 2021 whistler162 Sep 2021 #39
Sirhan Sirhan, Hinkley,... LudwigPastorius Sep 2021 #22
Its ridiculous isnt it? People like this should NEVER go free nt oldsoftie Sep 2021 #23
Maybe these people won't kill again, in the professional opinion of those who exam them, but... LudwigPastorius Sep 2021 #26
I agree nt oldsoftie Sep 2021 #31
Is the line for permanent imprisonment based on who the target is? onenote Sep 2021 #36
"Aggravating circumstances" make a charge heavier. Yes, there is a difference. oldsoftie Sep 2021 #42
I hear you, but I think your approach is a slippery slope. onenote Sep 2021 #44
So they are having a special on presidential assassins this month? nt. BlueIdaho Sep 2021 #24
Why should it matter who someone shoots or kills? Jon King Sep 2021 #32
Why it does matter Ron Obvious Sep 2021 #35
Then pass a law making an attack on a president punishable by life in prison with no onenote Sep 2021 #37
Should the insanity defense be abolished? onenote Sep 2021 #38
Watch out everyone Marthe48 Sep 2021 #43
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. judge will grant unc...»Reply #11