Latest Breaking News

onenote

(46,127 posts)

80. No.

Fri Oct 26, 2012, 01:10 PM

Oct 2012

Romney's testimony was impounded -- it was never made public. Plus it was given two years after the stock went public, so it could hardly lower the price that Ms. Stemberg got for her shares. Moreover, the testimony indicates that around the time that Stemberg was selling her shares, Romney elected not to purchase the maximum amount of a more value "preferred" class of stock that was being offered for $2.90 because he thought the price was too high.

Unless the gag order is lifted (and I hope it is) and Ms. Stemberg has something to say that does not square with the testimony or addresses something not covered in the testimony, the testimony itself seems to be a dead end.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

95 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Breaking Update: Court Unseals Potentially Devastating Testimony-Romney Said Stocks Sold at 1/10th [View all] kpete Oct 2012 OP

I wish the average voter gave even the slightest shit about this. trotsky Oct 2012 #1

exactly heaven05 Oct 2012 #15

He not only has friends who own sports teams. He also has friends who own polling valerief Oct 2012 #28

I think if the headline read "Romney really is a serial killer" mountain grammy Oct 2012 #92

I hope this gets appropriate attention. mzmolly Oct 2012 #2

Romney's a skank... crunch60 Oct 2012 #63

Did Romney perjure himself? Hugabear Oct 2012 #3

Not likely DrToast Oct 2012 #8

Exactly. This is a waste of time. BlueStreak Oct 2012 #49

Unless he knew an IPO was in the works. nt msanthrope Oct 2012 #51

He DID. WinkyDink Oct 2012 #95

But, the information he provided to qualify himself as an expert might JDPriestly Oct 2012 #65

What's interesting about his "opinion" is how WRONG it was. MADem Oct 2012 #71

Right. An attorney who posts on this board and another one I go to explained plethoro Oct 2012 #93

Statute of Limitations on Perjury formercia Oct 2012 #10

somewhere a parade is being rained on leftyohiolib Oct 2012 #20

No. naaman fletcher Oct 2012 #25

He is a slime. I understand Gloria Allred is filing a new motion to have the gag order lifted. hrmjustin Oct 2012 #4

I wonder who bought the shares formercia Oct 2012 #5

This is only really a story if Bain bought them or if the ex-husband bought them back and told her Squinch Oct 2012 #46

Will tv pick it up soon? hrmjustin Oct 2012 #6

I'm confident that it will be the lead story Orrex Oct 2012 #54

Frame the meme: "Romney lied to a woman to help her ex make a fat profit". People understand that. Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2012 #7

And cheat his former spouse in the divorce proceedings! eom Kolesar Oct 2012 #14

I dont see what the issue is here pasto76 Oct 2012 #9

Maybe you don't know - TBF Oct 2012 #13

I somewhat agree, possibly not as much an issue as we'd like to think groundloop Oct 2012 #18

The assertion is that Romney mislead the courts in a divorce case, mzmolly Oct 2012 #21

mittnocchio is a piece of shit underthematrix Oct 2012 #11

Mittnocchio!! MichDem10 Oct 2012 #23

Pathological Liar chuckstevens Oct 2012 #12

I think it's B. nt naaman fletcher Oct 2012 #26

C. Both A and B. Jackpine Radical Oct 2012 #34

Not much here texasmomof3 Oct 2012 #16

Do you think that Romney is clean on this? hrmjustin Oct 2012 #31

Yes, this is what I think.. defacto7 Oct 2012 #32

I Really tbennett76 Oct 2012 #40

Are you kidding? bitchkitty Oct 2012 #69

You are the reason texasmomof3 Oct 2012 #74

writes the guy with 16 posts - eom fleur-de-lisa Oct 2012 #85

"Prozac Generation of 'Mommies'"? democrattotheend Oct 2012 #90

So? riverwalker Oct 2012 #42

It's only a story if Bain bought the shares, or if the wife sold the shares back to the husband. Squinch Oct 2012 #47

I agree texasmomof3 Oct 2012 #76

Wow. That sounds so...professional. aquart Oct 2012 #48

You are in no position to have any idea what this material indicates. Nor am I. Bluenorthwest Oct 2012 #70

I was wondering about all of that too renate Oct 2012 #81

It just does not end with this liar lexw Oct 2012 #17

The obvious question lies in the discrepancy between Romney's value for Staples bayareamike Oct 2012 #19

If you're liked by him, he'll lie for you. If you aren't liked by him, you're screwed. SleeplessinSoCal Oct 2012 #22

Hey Trump DonCoquixote Oct 2012 #24

This message was self-deleted by its author MadDash Oct 2012 #27

Nah. They only hate it when they cam pin it on a Dem. Jackpine Radical Oct 2012 #37

One thing is for sure, Staples isn't appreciating the publicity and it's bound to influence libdem4life Oct 2012 #29

Romney is a fucking liar, and so far, this doesn't seem to be news. liberalmuse Oct 2012 #30

because our corporate media benefits from amoral folks like Romney fascisthunter Oct 2012 #50

Thanks for sharing this! n/t Paddy Ryan Oct 2012 #33

Welcome to DU hrmjustin Oct 2012 #35

Thank you! Paddy Ryan Oct 2012 #45

Perjury riverwalker Oct 2012 #36

Anything to distract from Obama's record.... sellitman Oct 2012 #38

"It's like we share the planet with fucking aliens."... TeeYiYi Oct 2012 #66

You can't be shocked Romney lied. caseymoz Oct 2012 #39

What's a little lie between friends? Cherchez la Femme Oct 2012 #41

So, she got shares and not cash as part of the settlement. tinrobot Oct 2012 #43

totally agree texasmomof3 Oct 2012 #75

#perjury riverwalker Oct 2012 #44

Unfortunately, not a smoking gun Kelvin Mace Oct 2012 #52

Probably a tax dodge by Romney tinrobot Oct 2012 #53

my guess, too---Tax Dodge Mitt does it again, what he's a REAL expert at wordpix Oct 2012 #58

I have the feeling that this is just the beginning. demgrrrll Oct 2012 #55

K&R DeSwiss Oct 2012 #56

someone certainly made lots of $ with a stock zooming from $2.25 to $22.50 in a year. wordpix Oct 2012 #57

One person that made a lot of money was Ms Stemberg onenote Oct 2012 #62

So you do not feel she had right to a fair and equitable distribution of their assests? Bluenorthwest Oct 2012 #73

I'm curious as to whet her you've read the transcript. onenote Oct 2012 #77

Thanks for the detailed explanation Rabid_Rabbit Oct 2012 #88

The wild card is what she would say that conflicts with or isn't covered by the transcript onenote Oct 2012 #89

Romney Stewland Oct 2012 #59

Agree, the more i read about him, alp227 Oct 2012 #91

What a great business man. Up2Late Oct 2012 #60

I've just spent a couple of hours quickly reviewing the entire transcript onenote Oct 2012 #61

Since you clearly have access to information the rest of us don't please share... Bluenorthwest Oct 2012 #72

The only information I have is the transcript which is available to everyone now. onenote Oct 2012 #78

This would be a HUGE story... FreeBC Oct 2012 #64

Nothing to look at here, move along. It's just another Mitt rMoney move. truthisfreedom Oct 2012 #67

"...He also has friends who own polling companies..." greiner3 Oct 2012 #68

SEC violation? Javaman Oct 2012 #79

No. onenote Oct 2012 #80

ahh okay. Thanks. :) nt Javaman Oct 2012 #86

Kick! sarcasmo Oct 2012 #82

R-100 (nt) Kurovski Oct 2012 #83

Why is this news One_Life_To_Give Oct 2012 #84

WillardLIES?OMG Vincardog Oct 2012 #87

what really irks me blondie58 Oct 2012 #94