Latest Breaking News

onenote

(46,073 posts)

36. For the umpeenth time: the Court did exactly what The Biden administration asked

Reply to bucolic_frolic (Reply #35)

Mon Oct 4, 2021, 02:48 PM

Oct 2021

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Donald Trump's Plan to Use $3.6 Billion for Border Wall [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2021 OP

Political hacks in robes!! PortTack Oct 2021 #1

2024 Fullduplexxx Oct 2021 #3

$3.6 Billion...n/t EndlessWire Oct 2021 #33

Maybe because the Biden administration asked them to onenote Oct 2021 #10

Yes, sir...it is an expected. win for Biden, if you read after the headline, and conversant with law. Alexander Of Assyria Oct 2021 #39

Yep Champp Oct 2021 #30

Perhaps sir, but not because of this essentially consent judgment. Alexander Of Assyria Oct 2021 #40

What are they setting the stage to reinstall Trump in 2024? Walleye Oct 2021 #2

FFS. The Court did what the Biden administration asked it to do onenote Oct 2021 #13

Oops I should've read that story a little closer Walleye Oct 2021 #14

Thanks elleng Oct 2021 #18

This what is called the Federalist Society on and in sitting judgment.... turbinetree Oct 2021 #4

Yes. Newsweek's headline is very inaccurate. Tomconroy Oct 2021 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author onenote Oct 2021 #11

Correct. It is what the Biden administration requested onenote Oct 2021 #12

ANY article about SC must in the FIRST PARAGRAPH from now on say what the VOTE WAS Eliot Rosewater Oct 2021 #6

The court typically doesn't disclose votes on cert petitions onenote Oct 2021 #16

We need to moderate the SC Marthe48 Oct 2021 #7

This ruling is not what you think onenote Oct 2021 #31

What little has been built of trump's wall has failed. brush Oct 2021 #8

The Court did exactly what the Biden administration requested onenote Oct 2021 #9

"Forget it, Jake. It's Chinatown." mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2021 #17

Please make this a thread of its own.. asiliveandbreathe Oct 2021 #20

thank you, thank you! stillcool Oct 2021 #29

Partisan hacks. the USSC is only for republican grievances PerceptionManagement Oct 2021 #15

So why did they do what the Biden administration requested? onenote Oct 2021 #23

Was the vote 5-4 or 6-3? Polybius Oct 2021 #19

This message was self-deleted by its author onenote Oct 2021 #21

Votes on cert petitions rarely are disclosed. onenote Oct 2021 #22

Thanks, looks like the headline was BS Polybius Oct 2021 #24

Yep. Very much so. onenote Oct 2021 #25

Newsweek lives for clicks... stillcool Oct 2021 #26

Talk about an "activist court" making and enacting policy from the bench... Ford_Prefect Oct 2021 #27

If this holds can Biden do what ever he wants with the money marie999 Oct 2021 #28

It will hold and it means the money can be used for its original purpose onenote Oct 2021 #37

Does anyone even remember that a wall was being built? leftyladyfrommo Oct 2021 #32

wasn't a lot of it just replacement of fence panels ? monkeyman1 Oct 2021 #34

SCOTUS can't even be relied upon to enforce Congress' intent bucolic_frolic Oct 2021 #35

For the umpeenth time: the Court did exactly what The Biden administration asked onenote Oct 2021 #36

The SCOTUS is not partisan... BigmanPigman Oct 2021 #38