Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elias7

(4,229 posts)
5. I had calculated 1 in 24,000 from available data for younger males when asked about it
Wed Oct 13, 2021, 09:25 AM
Oct 2021

I think pretty much all cases were mild and self-limited (1-2 weeks). Risk even less for older males and for females. It was a simple calculation of going to VAERS, getting the number of reported cases of myocarditis, and dividing into number of vaccine recipients total. How anyone could make that “mistake” is beyond me, since one in a thousand (0.1%) is fairly substantial and should have sent off red flags to those doing the research, i.e. it is difficult to believe no one picked that up.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Covid study linking vacci...»Reply #5