Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Merlot

(9,696 posts)

1. I'd prefer a different brand for added protection.

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Wed Oct 13, 2021, 12:11 PM

Oct 2021

The document, released in advance of a Friday meeting of the agency’s vaccine advisers, could have significant influence on whether the 15 million Americans who have received the one-dose vaccine will be allowed to get a second shot, or if they will instead be urged to get a different brand of vaccine for added protection.

J&J has issued glowing reports about its own vaccine - but so far these reports have not been validated.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

An F.D.A. analysis suggests that J.&J. has not presented robust evidence for booster shots. [View all] BumRushDaShow Oct 2021 OP

I'd prefer a different brand for added protection. Merlot Oct 2021 #1

I saw an article around the end of September BumRushDaShow Oct 2021 #2

I'll be on the look out for that, thanks Merlot Oct 2021 #3

I think this is the article where I saw it BumRushDaShow Oct 2021 #4

This is one of the questions the government should be deciding this week BlueIdaho Oct 2021 #7

Does that mean the J&J shot actually confers better and longer immunity? PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2021 #5

No, it doesn't. LisaL Oct 2021 #6

No, it means that it doesn't fit the criteria. Igel Oct 2021 #8

No, it means that it doesn't fit the criteria. Igel Oct 2021 #9