Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(170,036 posts)
23. I had posted the portion of a 2017 law upthread
Tue Oct 19, 2021, 05:22 PM
Oct 2021

(that was ignored for 4 years) that authorized this - https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=2815201

H.R.2430 - FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017

and that included the directive to work on and issue rules on OTC hearing aids. It was signed by TFG in August 2017, and promptly ignored for the next 4 years.

Here is that provision (from the above link) -

(Sec. 709) The FDA must categorize certain hearing aids as over-the-counter hearing aids and issue regulations regarding those hearing aids. The regulations for over-the-counter hearing aids must: (1) provide reasonable assurances of safety and efficacy; (2) establish output limits and labeling requirements; and (3) describe requirements for the sale of hearing aids in-person, by mail, or online, without a prescription. The FDA must determine whether premarket notification is required for over-the-counter hearing aids to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.

State and local governments may not establish or continue in effect requirements specifically applicable to hearing products that are not identical to FDA requirements and that restrict or interfere with the servicing or sale of over-the-counter hearing aids.

The FDA must update and finalize its draft guidance on hearing products. The guidance must clarify which products are medical devices.


I expect as part of the rule making process, there will be elucidation as to what types of "hearing loss" this would apply to (and it might end up pretty narrow). I also expect at some point (like you see with vaccines), that there will be some type of coordination with CDC to determine the types/levels of hearing loss that might be authorized for OTC products.

For example, CDC has a page here - https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/hearing_loss/what_if_i_already_have_hearing_loss.html

where it's possible such an OTC product is reclassified under a different name (e.g., as a new "Assistive Listening Device" vs a "hearing aid", which could be away to keep the latter as prescription) but could function "in ear". What this then does is set up a way to monitor the manufacturing practices to ensure the safety of that class of devices similar to how other OTC device products are surveilled.

CDC's main site on "hearing" is here (they note that October is "National Protect Your Hearing Month" too) - https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/hearing_loss/default.html

So I think aside from trying to break the price-fixing and near monopoly of a few large companies that are ripping people off, the idea here is to re-look at handling what is probably a common issue and find different ways to address it to improve quality of life.

FDA has distinctions on handling prescription vs OTC medical devices in general - https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/products-and-medical-procedures/over-counter-otc-medical-devices-considerations-device-manufacturers

(just as an example, one can buy a blood pressure monitor or a pulse oximeter OTC - both being medical devices)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This was part of a bill put together by Elizabeth Warren w/ some help from Grassley rurallib Oct 2021 #1
What did they say? Champp Oct 2021 #2
Is it really wise, though? frazzled Oct 2021 #3
I don't think any of this is precluding those needing presecription devices BumRushDaShow Oct 2021 #5
Yes. Hearing aid technology is leaping forward, and this is breaking Hortensis Oct 2021 #21
I tried OTC aids. My opinion? Waste of money. Scottie Mom Oct 2021 #25
Thanks, that is what I was trying to say frazzled Oct 2021 #27
Absolutely! Scottie Mom Oct 2021 #28
AirPods? Lol unblock Oct 2021 #4
I think that is the type of "innovation" (including repurposing) BumRushDaShow Oct 2021 #7
KnR Hekate Oct 2021 #6
If this also lowers the cost it would be great. I'm an advocate of some kind of exam though ... Auggie Oct 2021 #8
Yep Sgent Oct 2021 #9
IMHO BumRushDaShow Oct 2021 #10
I lost about 30% of my hearing in the past several years... Archae Oct 2021 #11
Ear buds with a mic could easily auto-adjust for each ear via a phone app NullTuples Oct 2021 #15
That's how mine work Randomthought Oct 2021 #17
This could have huge impact on the industry DavidDvorkin Oct 2021 #12
I would like to know where the $5,000 comes from. LogicFirst Oct 2021 #13
The OP article is actually linking to a White House Fact Sheet BumRushDaShow Oct 2021 #16
Dementia risk increases with hearing impairment so this proposal will have even greater impact. JudyM Oct 2021 #14
CPAP next? keithbvadu2 Oct 2021 #18
In this case BumRushDaShow Oct 2021 #20
I had a CPAP machine from the VA but after a while the pressure wasn't enough. marie999 Oct 2021 #24
The hearing aid industry is the biggest medical ripoff of all. MineralMan Oct 2021 #19
I had a hearing test through the VA. marie999 Oct 2021 #22
I had posted the portion of a 2017 law upthread BumRushDaShow Oct 2021 #23
can we put cpap machine in there too? catsudon Oct 2021 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hearing aids without a pr...»Reply #23