Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

George II

(67,782 posts)
46. That's the way I see it. Plus, the proposal being looked at the most calls for a tax....
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 01:32 PM
Oct 2021

...on "wealth" , i.e., net worth, and then re-taxed on that same "wealth" the next year, too.

So let's say someone has $2B (I wish it were me!), that person gets taxed X-% on that $2B. If that person does nothing, no change in that $2B, it's still taxed the next year by X-%. So the same dormant assets get taxed over and over again.

A more sensible thing to do is what we already have in place - income tax. Let's get rid of all the loopholes that lets the rich hide or declare exemptions for most of their income.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes, let's not alienate the billionaries. mzmolly Oct 2021 #1
How much is being paid to block any progressive legislation by the Republican plutocrats? olegramps Oct 2021 #54
+1... myohmy2 Oct 2021 #62
He's suggesting I'm just like a billionaire? Bobstandard Oct 2021 #2
Oh ffs, is he never satisfied. badhair77 Oct 2021 #3
Interesting how we call them billionaires instead of oligarchs... bluewater Oct 2021 #4
+1 jalan48 Oct 2021 #9
Poor babies. rickyhall Oct 2021 #5
Jeezus H. Something that helps the people, the country and the planet is being called divisive by Evolve Dammit Oct 2021 #6
I am so sick of crybaby rich pricks! BlueJac Oct 2021 #7
Lawrence O'Donnell flat out predicted this last night!! Jon King Oct 2021 #8
I guess we'll have to take what we can get, ya know, something is better than nothing Fiendish Thingy Oct 2021 #10
So, Little By Little He Is Going To Remove Everything From THe Bill Me. Oct 2021 #11
And then, at the last moment Bettie Oct 2021 #22
Taxing billionaires is wildly popular. He's not even trying to pretend anymore. So out of touch he onecaliberal Oct 2021 #12
So is the Republicans' refusal to raise the minimum wage Mr. Ected Oct 2021 #13
The rotating villains plan seems to be working for the donor class. aocommunalpunch Oct 2021 #14
It was my understanding that the framework to pay for the plan was agreed to Bev54 Oct 2021 #15
Well there goes that plan. Now who's gonna stop the proposed corporate tax increase? n/t PoliticAverse Oct 2021 #16
You heard right. Manchin spoke to Reporters answering their questions. True Blue American Oct 2021 #17
Well then he should be talking to Sinema -- She's the one who won't raise the vsrazdem Oct 2021 #18
The abuse of the tax code Casady1 Oct 2021 #19
This freakin' guy... SKKY Oct 2021 #20
& well, I think he's still on board for the laughable corporate tax increase, such a brave soul he yaesu Oct 2021 #21
divisive: 333,999,300 for - 700 against out of 334,000,000 rurallib Oct 2021 #23
Why is kacekwl Oct 2021 #24
I think the title is overwrought. "Denounces" isn't what I heard. nt pnwmom Oct 2021 #25
So much for getting what we can get. Give an inch, then another, and another, another ... another. KPN Oct 2021 #26
Two points on this: George II Oct 2021 #27
What has changed is that many more people are millionaires these days, especially in states pnwmom Oct 2021 #32
There were 10.8 millionaire households in 2016, there are 12.0 in 2020. I think it's more a factor.. George II Oct 2021 #33
Where did you get that figure? I've seen numbers like that that excluded primary residences, pnwmom Oct 2021 #37
Here's the data... George II Oct 2021 #41
Right, it excludes primary residences. But most ordinary people who own million dollar homes -- pnwmom Oct 2021 #44
Isn't owning a house that has appreciated also an "unrealized capital gain" ? MichMan Oct 2021 #39
That's the way I see it. Plus, the proposal being looked at the most calls for a tax.... George II Oct 2021 #46
The NYT spinning shit again pecosbob Oct 2021 #28
Well that didn't take long....who would have thunk.... turbinetree Oct 2021 #29
Divisive? Harker Oct 2021 #30
A continuing asshole Traildogbob Oct 2021 #31
Divisive? IL Dem Oct 2021 #34
Since when ... rustysgurl Oct 2021 #35
Sniff! Sniff! The billionaires won't be able to afford another Yacht and Lamborghini! twin_ghost Oct 2021 #36
In terms of "trashing" re: the TOS, does he still qualify as a Democrat? Orrex Oct 2021 #38
only in terms of keeping our majority in the Senate LymphocyteLover Oct 2021 #43
Clearly not MichMan Oct 2021 #45
Well... Orrex Oct 2021 #55
LOL. Back to the old "job creators" canard. PSPS Oct 2021 #40
Head. Meet. Desk. LymphocyteLover Oct 2021 #42
I love Borowitz Archetypist Oct 2021 #47
The quote should be "row together," not "grow." hay rick Oct 2021 #48
re: "assets can be borrowed off to live virtually income tax free" thesquanderer Oct 2021 #49
He needs to be dealt with. hamsterjill Oct 2021 #50
Work requirements for tax breaks squidboy6 Oct 2021 #51
This tax doesn't make sense to me. Steelrolled Oct 2021 #52
The argument has been BumRushDaShow Oct 2021 #58
I don't care about what scheme is used for the taxing. Steelrolled Oct 2021 #60
One of the things that has been bandied about for years BumRushDaShow Oct 2021 #61
Yes agreed. Steelrolled Oct 2021 #63
He thinks the 0.001% of the 1% is not already 'divided' from the 99.999%? Justice matters. Oct 2021 #53
Realistically we need to pass a constitutional amendment... manicdem Oct 2021 #56
Bullshit! Manchin's opposition to the proposal is divisive. Martin68 Oct 2021 #57
Manchin is an obstructionist. hamsterjill Oct 2021 #59
Primary him out. truthisfreedom Oct 2021 #65
Joe "No Billionaire Left Behind" Manchin. oasis Oct 2021 #64
I am totally against taxing people on a paper rise of stocks no matter how rich they are. marie999 Oct 2021 #66
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Manchin denounces the Dem...»Reply #46