Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
83. No one knows that...
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 07:56 PM
Jan 2012

But Romney is getting about as much free press as he'll get in this campaign. Generally, when one party is in the process of picking its nominee, they receive relative good numbers against the sitting president. Kerry, at this point eight years ago, led Bush, and in some instances the lead was by a sizable margin (7 points).

Why? Because the focus is almost entirely on the candidate as he wraps up victories. Obama is president, but he's not getting near the spotlight as Romney. So, it shouldn't be a surprise people would consider this his high watermark because once it's mano a mano, Romney's numbers are unlikely to rise and more likely to fall (as was the case for Kerry in '04 and Dole in '96 - whose high numbers were earlier in the year).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm surprised about that ... meegbear Jan 2012 #1
PBO is gonna wipe the floor with any one of them. Someone needs to buy FOX a clue.... Little Star Jan 2012 #2
you would think that in a fox poll of fox viewers leftyohiolib Jan 2012 #3
not of Fox viewers OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #26
thankyou for the correction leftyohiolib Jan 2012 #76
"Yet for Romney, his support is mainly anti-Obama..." FailureToCommunicate Jan 2012 #4
Old Mitt the Ripper qanda Jan 2012 #5
This is Romney's hi water mark. Old and In the Way Jan 2012 #6
How do you know that? I wish I had your crystal ball. n/t totodeinhere Jan 2012 #23
No one knows that... Drunken Irishman Jan 2012 #83
I agree with everything you said. But under certain circumstances an incumbent president can lose as totodeinhere Jan 2012 #84
the voting machines will be set to assure a very close race. madrchsod Jan 2012 #7
And they will vote for him, whether they actually do or not. RUMMYisFROSTED Jan 2012 #72
We really need the unrec feature for threads like this. eom tawadi Jan 2012 #8
Why? If you have an issue with it, why cant you articulate it? Is it that hard to do? nt stevenleser Jan 2012 #31
OK. I will tell you tawadi Jan 2012 #45
Indeed, stonecutter357 Jan 2012 #47
+1,000 nt zanana1 Jan 2012 #66
So, kill the messenger is the proper approach? Just because FoxNews is a scumbag outfit does not Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #49
FoxNews is NOT able to report any facts. October Jan 2012 #51
I have no idea how to respond to such an obtuse post. Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #54
(Yet, you responded.) My apologies. That was some sort of a tech glitch is my best guess. October Feb 2012 #89
It's not the ability I question varelse Jan 2012 #59
Willingness......to do what? Vote? I must confess I don't understand your comment... Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #60
I agree Skittles Jan 2012 #52
Yes, we must only pay attention to those news sources that are never, ever wrong..about anything. Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #55
Fox News actually went to court to defend their "right" to falsify news Art_from_Ark Jan 2012 #61
Who are you......really? nt zanana1 Jan 2012 #67
Someone who thinks that shooting the messenger no matter the message is incredibly stupid. Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #78
Really? No matter the messenger? Interesting philosophy. October Feb 2012 #88
what part of the word LEGITIMATE do you not understand? Skittles Jan 2012 #70
I get your position...you believe they are never right. Tell me about one that's never wrong, and Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #80
no Skittles Jan 2012 #81
Rupert? 'Zat you? mac56 Jan 2012 #77
Very funny. Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #79
"Not very smart" mac56 Jan 2012 #82
Is that your only defense of Fox News? To say that others are wrong sometimes, too? October Feb 2012 #90
Surely we would believe a poll by 'Fux News'! dmosh42 Jan 2012 #9
election chances existentialist Jan 2012 #30
Don't forget to subtract %12 for disenfranchised voters TheEuclideanOne Jan 2012 #10
Post removed Post removed Jan 2012 #11
As is clear from the OP, I posted the poll because of the enthusiasm gap it shows. highplainsdem Jan 2012 #16
Unless we can get win some states in the south, the enthusiasm gap will not matter in my view. It still_one Jan 2012 #19
That's just a different type of enthusiasm, and not necessarily less motivating usregimechange Jan 2012 #12
+1 stockholmer Jan 2012 #15
Yeah, it's gonna be a close one thelordofhell Jan 2012 #13
It will be close regardless of the Rep candidate. I think the anti-Obama vote will be huge. gateley Jan 2012 #14
Yes, a lot can happen in 9 in a half months Ishoutandscream2 Jan 2012 #17
You have distilled the blather down to the undeniable simple truth. Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #50
I've been doing volunteer work for Obama's campaign.... zanana1 Jan 2012 #68
Well then, that's wonderful news...we can all kick back, relax and not even worry. Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #75
Which state? Do you know the demographics of these people? fujiyama Feb 2012 #93
yep time to get Epiphany4z Jan 2012 #18
Consider the source rocktivity Jan 2012 #20
But several polls from other source are saying the same thing. The Real Clear Politics average totodeinhere Jan 2012 #24
Do you have a reliable source? Jack Rabbit Jan 2012 #21
If you ever dispute any poll, go to pollingreport or realclearpolitics. This one is in line with stevenleser Jan 2012 #32
creepy stonecutter357 Jan 2012 #40
Obama is one point ahead in a FAUX poll? ingac70 Jan 2012 #22
I doubt it will be that close. KeyserSoze87 Jan 2012 #25
There are plenty people who will gladly accept if not praise what Mitt did in those venues. Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #56
There are people out there who will accept what Romney did at Bain Capital? That's scary. KeyserSoze87 Jan 2012 #74
Strange how Obama is ahead in a Fox poll... Ter Jan 2012 #27
which ones? SemperEadem Jan 2012 #44
It's entirely consistent with their political expertise to tell their followers that they're in dang Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #57
Fox also said that Gingrich was the clear front runner on December 8, 2011 bathroommonkey76 Jan 2012 #28
Gingrich WAS the clear front runner at the time. All polls showed him in front at the time. stevenleser Jan 2012 #33
I don't believe that Gingrich led in voter preference or bathroommonkey76 Jan 2012 #37
How many other polls would it take to convince you you are wrong stevenleser Jan 2012 #86
For instance, here is all Real Clear Politics Iowa caucus data stevenleser Jan 2012 #87
Does that include the 15-20% Turbineguy Jan 2012 #29
I hope it isn't tight, we need Barack to blow this guy's doors off Guy Montag Jan 2012 #34
What states do the respondents live in? Richardo Jan 2012 #35
One factor not considered - President Obama hasn't started campaigning yet groundloop Jan 2012 #36
You also must interpret FOX much like Pravda. tight race = Romney losing. landslide = Romney ahead Pholus Jan 2012 #38
So IOW it would be a landslide for Obama. Rex Jan 2012 #39
According to Fux News??? LOL SoapBox Jan 2012 #41
This is good to know. Can't take any thing for granted. nt Mojorabbit Jan 2012 #42
only in fux land is this true SemperEadem Jan 2012 #43
Not sure the enthusiasm gap will mean much on voting day. crim son Jan 2012 #46
Well if Fox says it it must be true... Fearless Jan 2012 #48
Fox News needs proper interpretation. Tutankhamun Jan 2012 #53
When I was a kid, we called that "whistling past the graveyard". As a longtime grownup, I call it Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #58
I meant to write “according to Fox News polling” Tutankhamun Jan 2012 #85
the secondary stats suggest this will be all about Obama 0rganism Jan 2012 #62
Wow. Any reasonable analysis would conclude... truthisfreedom Jan 2012 #63
Down-ticket races will make a difference, I think. MissMillie Jan 2012 #73
It is only a Faux "News" poll Presidentcokedupfratboy Jan 2012 #64
Will it be close enough to steal? Hugin Jan 2012 #65
do not think of terms of common sense DonCoquixote Jan 2012 #69
Who cares? TomClash Jan 2012 #71
It will be tight. Mitt is a threat to Obama is Mass and Michigan gregtownsand Feb 2012 #91
Right, because polls in February tell the story of November 2012. high density Feb 2012 #92
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Fox News poll: 2012 Obama...»Reply #83