Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good. And i'll reitterate, GET OUT OF CHINA. oldsoftie Nov 2021 #1
They don't have to be our enemy. Progress was made for decades twodogsbarking Nov 2021 #2
are you kidding? catsudon Nov 2021 #3
No I am not kidding. twodogsbarking Nov 2021 #5
If you mean they took advantage of us for years then yes EX500rider Nov 2021 #4
I don't recall mentioning any of that. twodogsbarking Nov 2021 #6
You may not have mentioned it but its certainly true. nt oldsoftie Nov 2021 #8
Yes I noticed that. nt EX500rider Nov 2021 #10
Many times people don't address the comment twodogsbarking Nov 2021 #15
Thats nonsense. And the Chinese people have zero say with a communist regime. oldsoftie Nov 2021 #7
The Chinese people also don't get to see any media that the regime doesn't want them to see... Violet_Crumble Nov 2021 #13
Yes. Just like NK. They block most of the internet. China is an enemy. oldsoftie Nov 2021 #16
China has decided to be the enemy of any country who questions or defies it... Violet_Crumble Nov 2021 #12
Distinguish between the government and the people. I detest their government twodogsbarking Nov 2021 #14
You cant DEAL with "the people". Govt controls access. Why is THAT so dificult to comprehend? oldsoftie Nov 2021 #17
I see. twodogsbarking Nov 2021 #18
Latest podcast from a channel I watch that talks about Chinese state media and current affairs pecosbob Nov 2021 #9
China carried out 'combat readiness patrol' as U.S. lawmakers visited Taipei SouthBayDem Nov 2021 #11
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Cross-party delegation fr...»Reply #8