Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: House Jan. 6 committee votes to hold former Trump DOJ official in criminal contempt [View all]gab13by13
(30,971 posts)26. Invoking the 5th implies
he's afraid of incriminating himself in a crime. Time for Merrick Garland to investigate him. Clark and Meadows have no intention of testifying before the select committee, Meadows won't testify under oath, they both want to run out the clock, let's stop kidding ourselves.
The argument that it's appropriate for Clark to take the 5th insults my intelligence. Taking the 5th is what guilty people do. Hillary Clinton voluntarily testified, publicly, for 11 hours and never took the 5th. Eric Holder voluntarily testified 9 times over Fast and Furious and never took the 5th.
I'm tired of this catering to seditionists. I call them traitors because what they did fits the dictionary definition of a traitor.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
House Jan. 6 committee votes to hold former Trump DOJ official in criminal contempt [View all]
mahatmakanejeeves
Dec 2021
OP
Doesn't he actually have to show up to invoke 5th amendment rights or executive privilege?
Walleye
Dec 2021
#3
It's actually appropriate for Jeffrey Clark to take the Fifth and sensible lawyers would recommend
mahatmakanejeeves
Dec 2021
#8
Of course it isn't an admission of guilt, legally speaking, but didn't TFG make a BFD
Ocelot II
Dec 2021
#9
Well, sure, but those statements were made in, uh, jest. Yeah, that's it, jest. NT
mahatmakanejeeves
Dec 2021
#11
I know it's not an admission of guilty, but I know how I'd bet if I were in Vegas!
Gore1FL
Dec 2021
#15
I can't wait for him to sit there and plead the 5th about 50 times. The questions will be great.
marble falls
Dec 2021
#20
Trump DOJ official to plead the 5th -- and Capitol riot committee will 'hang it around his neck'
turbinetree
Dec 2021
#22
Give him the Mary Surratt treatment ... lock his ass up at what was the old Washington Arsenal
Botany
Dec 2021
#24
I have a question for everyone at DU in favor of gutting the Fifth Amendment.
mahatmakanejeeves
Dec 2021
#40