Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Jakes Progress

(11,213 posts)

32. Bullshit. The accurate line is "According to this judge".

Reply to RobinA (Reply #26)

Thu Dec 2, 2021, 02:03 AM

Dec 2021

Wanna bet that if tfg had ordered vaccines, this judge would have ruled exactly the opposite. There is no law that says a president can't order vaccinations.

Assholes just found an asshole judge who would crawl out of trump's ass long enough to rule that people should die because that will piss off liberals.

This has nothing to do with law, or precedent, or process. It was blatant political bias from the bench. The law sez no such thing. This judge did. Not the law.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A federal judge blocks Biden's vaccine mandate for U.S. health workers. [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2021 OP

Trump judge, should be removed from the bench today. Eliot Rosewater Nov 2021 #1

On what grounds? mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2021 #2

Nice insult with the feelings hurt bullshit Eliot Rosewater Nov 2021 #3

On what grounds? NT kelly1mm Nov 2021 #11

No he shouldn't Polybius Dec 2021 #13

Agree ananda Dec 2021 #21

Take it to the next level. Biden can do this. OAITW r.2.0 Nov 2021 #4

I thought the same when I saw the NYT breaking banner BumRushDaShow Nov 2021 #5

Different court Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2021 #6

Western Louisiana court Roy Rolling Dec 2021 #19

So a single solitary judge BlueIdaho Nov 2021 #7

Yes. See Marbury v. Madison. kelly1mm Nov 2021 #12

What about Jacobson v Massachusetts? Orrex Dec 2021 #20

Jacobson v Mass involved a state law, passed by the MA legislature and signed into kelly1mm Dec 2021 #24

Thanks for that analysis Orrex Dec 2021 #25

OSHA says, we can do this, because... mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2021 #27

Thanks for linking to OSHA's argument. So far kelly1mm Dec 2021 #29

Related, kinda, sorta mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2021 #8

Another pro-virus idiot. Lucky Luciano Nov 2021 #9

who wants to go to their unvaxed doctor? orleans Nov 2021 #10

Or an er or clinic where some are vaxed and some not. ananda Dec 2021 #22

Follow the science. Socal31 Dec 2021 #23

What science? Mysterian Dec 2021 #30

This is dangerous nonsense Hav Dec 2021 #31

Sheer idiocy Bayard Dec 2021 #14

Regardless of what this judge says, my rights as a patient are entitled NOT to be attended by JohnSJ Dec 2021 #15

Find a better judge, or SCOTUS Historic NY Dec 2021 #16

What a doofus. We mandate vaccinations all the time. Jakes Progress Dec 2021 #17

It Doesn't Say RobinA Dec 2021 #26

Thanks. I've just posted a link to OSHA's arguments, in mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2021 #28

Bullshit. The accurate line is "According to this judge". Jakes Progress Dec 2021 #32

Redo it and give them the choice of doing it or losing the federal funding they receive. cstanleytech Dec 2021 #18