Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

peppertree

(21,604 posts)
7. Latin America is known for its coups.
Wed Dec 15, 2021, 10:34 PM
Dec 2021

What's less widely known, is that, often, each country's first coup was endorsed by that country's (very conservative) supreme court.

The ones that followed, in fact, often used that first endorsement as precedent.

Repeating HRC's warnings like its a new thing. Budi Dec 2021 #1
Hillary wanted to expand the SC 5 years ago? Polybius Dec 2021 #2
We wouldn't have to be expanding the SC at all. Budi Dec 2021 #4
Can't go back in time though Polybius Dec 2021 #6
Nothing wrong with moving forward. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2021 #10
Sounds like you have an issue with my favorite senator. BComplex Dec 2021 #35
Sounds like some have an issue with mine . Budi Dec 2021 #38
Wut? progressoid Dec 2021 #18
Warren's suggesting an expansion of the Supreme Court.. whathehell Dec 2021 #19
Hillary was not the first and Warren won't be the last. soldierant Dec 2021 #24
Good on HRC. Magoo48 Dec 2021 #30
It could be done if the whole country were Massachusetts bucolic_frolic Dec 2021 #3
Exactly right. Warren is well aware of that too. Budi Dec 2021 #5
Latin America is known for its coups. peppertree Dec 2021 #7
The argument for expanding the Court least likely to win support onenote Dec 2021 #8
+2 Slammer Dec 2021 #9
the el'supremo court his turned into a kangaroo court !! monkeyman1 Dec 2021 #11
So refreshing to hear a progressive peoli Dec 2021 #12
It. Needs. To. Be. Done. notinkansas Dec 2021 #13
No need to expand SC. Rick Perry (Yes, him) has ideal solution. ExTex Dec 2021 #14
Among other questions: what happens if the Senate refuses to confirm a nominee? onenote Dec 2021 #15
But that'll be even harder to do Polybius Dec 2021 #17
There have been nine Supreme Court justices since 1869 - 152 years. BAD to change it now. George II Dec 2021 #16
Bad to be second to want to change it. nt BootinUp Dec 2021 #21
From 9 to 13 is my Suggestion Knight of the Middle Dec 2021 #20
Yep. FM123 Dec 2021 #22
+1 Deminpenn Dec 2021 #39
At the same time, as many have recommended, establish a Code of Ethics. quaint Dec 2021 #36
Do it, or live under GOP rule forever dalton99a Dec 2021 #23
The need is more critical now than when Hillary was running, since Trump appointed 3 right wingers Liberty Belle Dec 2021 #25
"the craziest loons we've ever had on the high court" Polybius Dec 2021 #37
13 JUDGES TO REPRESENT THE 13 ORIGINAL COLONIES nvme Dec 2021 #26
K&R ck4829 Dec 2021 #27
Well... Mike Nelson Dec 2021 #28
Let's go SCOTUS The Jungle 1 Dec 2021 #29
If the court is expanded and turns conservative again ArizonaLib Dec 2021 #31
What Would Mitch Do? NonPC Dec 2021 #32
And they should not be appointed for life. mahannah Dec 2021 #33
what's the problem...? myohmy2 Dec 2021 #34
CJ Roberts knows full well the consequences Deminpenn Dec 2021 #40
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Elizabeth Warren calls fo...»Reply #7