Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(172,530 posts)
Tue Dec 28, 2021, 04:22 PM Dec 2021

The C.D.C. significantly lowers its estimate of Omicron's prevalence nationwide [View all]

Source: New York Times

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that the Omicron variant now accounts for roughly 59 percent of all Covid cases in the United States, a significant decrease from the agency’s previous estimate. The update shows how hard it is to track the fast-spreading variant in real time and how poorly the agency has communicated its uncertainty, experts said. Last week, the C.D.C. said that Omicron accounted for approximately 73 percent of variants circulating in the United States in the week ending Dec. 18. But in its revision, the agency said the variant accounted for about 23 percent of cases that week.

In other words, Delta, which has dominated U.S. infections since summer, still reigned in the United States that week. That could mean that a significant number of current Covid hospitalizations were driven by infections from Delta, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, a former commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, suggested on Twitter. Hospitalizations typically lag several weeks behind initial infections. Experts said they were not surprised by the revisions, given that the C.D.C.’s estimates are rough guesses, with a wide range of possible values known as “confidence intervals.”

Cases of Omicron can only be confirmed by genetic sequencing, which is only performed on a portion of samples across the country. And Omicron is still spreading extremely fast. Still, they said the C.D.C. did a poor job communicating the uncertainty of its estimates. “The 73 percent got a lot more attention than the confidence intervals, and I think this is one example among many where scientists are trying to project an air of confidence about what’s going to happen,” said David O’Connor, a virologist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Dr. O’Connor said he initially thought the initial 73 percent point estimate “seemed high.” The agency came up with the estimate based on a “relatively small number of sequences,” he added.

“It’s like playing Name That Tune, and trying to say, based on just the first note, if the song is Ice Ice Baby by Vanilla Ice, or Under Pressure,” Dr. O’Connor said. “Without more data it can be really hard to know which one it’s going to be.” The new estimate of 59 percent is also a rough calculation, experts said, and will most likely be revised in future weeks. “I just want people to be very aware that that is an estimate, that’s not actually from sequence-confirmed cases,” said Nathan Grubaugh, an epidemiologist at the Yale School of Public Health. “With Omicron in particular, it’s been very difficult to have any sort of projections, because things are changing just so so rapidly.”

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/12/28/world/omicron-covid-vaccine-tests/the-cdc-significantly-lowers-its-estimate-of-omicrons-prevalence-nationwide



Interesting because I had just checked for updates on their bar charts.

The one done 12/18/21 was this -



The latest is this -



I think they use models that estimate a certain infection rate based on what data they have and then extrapolate from there. However with a still-small number of actual sequencing being done, the estimates will have a higher bias towards those actually doing sequencing, thus introducing a lot of uncertainty. But as other locales start ramping their sequencing up, those places may not be seeing the surge yet.
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In other news, the world just surpassed it's previous all-time high, set last April, of progree Dec 2021 #1
Not just the world BumRushDaShow Dec 2021 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 2021 #3
Hospitalization and deaths are a more important indicator IronLionZion Dec 2021 #4
As long as new case counts are a good predictor of future increases of hospitalization and deaths progree Dec 2021 #5
Vermont's health department mentioned that case numbers and % positive karynnj Dec 2021 #10
Oh for sure. The case numbers are a vast undercount. So when the reported case numbers progree Dec 2021 #11
I've been saying that since last year oldsoftie Dec 2021 #9
Confidence interval? NH Ethylene Dec 2021 #6
Well you have red states refusing to timely report BumRushDaShow Dec 2021 #8
The input to the models can be two weeks old, so the projections in... Lucky Luciano Dec 2021 #13
Thank-you for this. NH Ethylene Dec 2021 #20
We're doing that in Minnesota - cancelling non-emergency procedures. & putting patients in hallway progree Dec 2021 #7
What could go wrong ? CentralMass Dec 2021 #12
Sadly this gives ammo to the anti-CDC conspiracy nuts truthisfreedom Dec 2021 #14
We so need to teach public health in schools. LisaM Dec 2021 #15
The CDC has done a lot of damage with its statements throughout this pandemic... KY_EnviroGuy Dec 2021 #16
You nailed it perfectly BumRushDaShow Dec 2021 #17
How about a Jesus Science perspective? You know, present it as a parable progree Dec 2021 #18
I expect some have tried that BumRushDaShow Dec 2021 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The C.D.C. significantly ...