Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

NNadir

(38,563 posts)

10. This is laughable from a "judge" who declared for and licensed corruption in "Citizens United."

Reply to Omaha Steve (Original post)

Fri Dec 31, 2021, 09:26 PM

Dec 2021

He is a political hack, and we have all the political hacks on the Court, from little Ms. Jesus/Trumpie worshipper installed by a corrupt Senator along with a slimy drunk, that they're "honest."

Bullshit Roberts. If America survives you - and it may not - you've taken some of the weight off of Taney, who declared human beings to be farm animals.

Declaring thugs to be honest politicians is not quite as bad, but it strongly leans in that direction.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Chief justice: Judges must better avoid financial conflicts [View all] Omaha Steve Dec 2021 OP

Or Else! dalton99a Dec 2021 #1

They take it seriously? Have these judges been indicted? SheltieLover Dec 2021 #2

Very seriously NQAS Dec 2021 #3

And political conflicts. Baitball Blogger Dec 2021 #4

Yup. Bought and paid for. /nt bucolic_frolic Dec 2021 #5

The Judiciary takes this matter seriously? As in a strongly worded letter seriously? Autumn Dec 2021 #6

He's concerned rpannier Dec 2021 #11

Look up concern and her picture is next to it. Autumn Dec 2021 #12

...and the absolute silence from his court about Clarence... Grins Jan 2022 #31

OMG should they be expecting a sternly worded letter from Roberts??? nt in2herbs Dec 2021 #7

A letter would be considered too strong for CJR. LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jan 2022 #32

I'll believe it when the RW SCOTUS "Justices" recuse themselves meow2u3 Dec 2021 #8

And they're not gonna pay attention to him. calimary Jan 2022 #15

A person would have to be fubar'd to believe this in this day & age ?????? monkeyman1 Dec 2021 #9

This is laughable from a "judge" who declared for and licensed corruption in "Citizens United." NNadir Dec 2021 #10

"Chief Justice" Roberts trying to look like he's still in charge PlanetBev Dec 2021 #13

Good God Roberts, have you no shame? Cozmo Jan 2022 #14

I'm sure that'll do it. ...nt 2naSalit Jan 2022 #16

Well Johnny can I call you Johnny, maybe you should start with Thomas and his wife and the turbinetree Jan 2022 #17

Roberts said he was just an umpire.. mountain grammy Jan 2022 #18

Looking at you, Justice Thomas. Midnight Writer Jan 2022 #19

Ouch! My wrists! dchill Jan 2022 #20

Or what? Double secret probation? twodogsbarking Jan 2022 #21

The SC is a partisan joke. BlueIdaho Jan 2022 #22

If Only The M$M Treated Financial Conflicts modrepub Jan 2022 #23

Judges Have Other, Worse Conflicts DallasNE Jan 2022 #24

Cough cough, Clarence Thomas, Kegger Kavanaugh Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2022 #25

Today's NYT raises an issue re sexual harassment claims in the Ninth Circuit, too. ancianita Jan 2022 #26

This focus on "individual stock ownership" feels like a bit like a red herring NullTuples Jan 2022 #27

When you consider that Roberts is responsible for opening the flood of dark money into politics Ford_Prefect Jan 2022 #28

need to go back to traffic court?? monkeyman1 Jan 2022 #29

Really? Closing the gate after the horses left the barn? IzzaNuDay Jan 2022 #30