Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rsdsharp

(11,641 posts)
8. This is what is called a conflict of laws case.
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 09:39 PM
Jan 2022

These are often like diving into a huge tub of worms. The various states, and or countries, which might have an interest in the case not only have substantive laws relative to the subject (e. g. who owns, or should own the painting?) but they also have their own conflicts laws (which state or country’s substantive law should we apply — ours? or the other state’s if it’s different — and that state’s laws might say to apply the first state’s laws). So the first question for the court is whether it has jurisdiction, and if so, what law to apply.

These kind of cases can drive you crazy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pissarro painting confisc...»Reply #8