Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Crepuscular

(1,068 posts)

12. ...

Reply to ificandream (Original post)

Tue Jan 25, 2022, 10:26 AM

Jan 2022

This is tilting at windmills while squandering public funds which could be better allocated to some program that would actually benefit those who need it the most. How much in public tax dollars will San Jose spend in litigating this law all the way up to the S.C., only to then lose and have to pay the plaintiffs legal fees, as well. How about spending it on affordable housing or some other tangible benefit for the disadvantaged instead.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

San Jose (CA) Council Set To Approve Requiring Gun Owners To Buy Liability Insurance, Pay Annual Fee [View all] ificandream Jan 2022 OP

Will be interesting if the insurance requirement stands madville Jan 2022 #1

Since shooting somebody is, in general, an intentional act Frasier Balzov Jan 2022 #4

These policies usually just protect the legal owner madville Jan 2022 #5

What is the difference James48 Jan 2022 #7

The second amendment is currently recognized as a madville Jan 2022 #11

Love it! ( lived in San Jose for 25 years). n/t iluvtennis Jan 2022 #2

Never hurts to try and bring the subject up for discussion. kimbutgar Jan 2022 #3

Insurance... Protects the gun owners,the public,and makes profit for NRA and gun orgs. keithbvadu2 Jan 2022 #6

What if I can't afford the costs? JBGraves Jan 2022 #8

With 7 hour waits, people can't afford to vote right now. SunSeeker Jan 2022 #9

This will never be allowed to stand in this Supreme Court. LiberatedUSA Jan 2022 #10

... Crepuscular Jan 2022 #12

That would be making people register their weapons which I oppose. marie999 Jan 2022 #13

After a review by forum hosts....LOCKING Omaha Steve Jan 2022 #14