Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lonestarblue

(13,596 posts)
18. This is exactly why Texas changes the law on signature matching.
Thu Feb 3, 2022, 08:27 AM
Feb 2022

The former law required matching to a signature no more than six years old. The new law allows the matching on any signature on file—the clerk’s choice. So a 30-year old signature is unlikely to EXACTLY match the same person’s signature today, thus giving an excuse to throw out ballots with Hispanic or other ethnic names and ballots from certain ZIP codes. Elections clerks are given no training in how to evaluate signatures.

With the new Texas requirements, which are similar to the secret handshake you only know if you’re part of the right group, around 59% of requests for mail ballots are being rejected, along with as much as 50% f voter registrations because people aren’t filling out a form correctly since it has conflicting information. And one of the worst decisions ever, you have to put your Social Security number on both the inside ballot and on the outside envelope to be mailed where anyone can see it and record it with the mailer’s name for use in security fraud. Way to go Texas Republican idiots!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yeah but, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #1
Yes. GOTV is a very important element. Why ridicule it? Why shit on it? NurseJackie Feb 2022 #15
shocked shocked i say dchill Feb 2022 #2
Well, slap me silly and call me a pickle...! RockRaven Feb 2022 #3
Sounds like local Democratic offices need to increase education. Hoyt Feb 2022 #4
Rural areas probably don't do much rejecting. L. Coyote Feb 2022 #5
Someone que Jim Nabors.... paleotn Feb 2022 #6
I'd like to know how many were missing Phoenix61 Feb 2022 #7
Implying the poll workers are racist? MichMan Feb 2022 #24
I was thinking more hidden bias. Phoenix61 Feb 2022 #25
How many people doing the rejecting are handwriting experts? groundloop Feb 2022 #8
That's a great question. OneCrazyDiamond Feb 2022 #20
Those Ballots Should Not Have Been Outright Rejected DallasNE Feb 2022 #9
That's A Feature Not A Bug WHITT Feb 2022 #10
is race part of voter registration? cadoman Feb 2022 #11
NAMES tell enough E. Normus Feb 2022 #17
yes, I've written algorithms for name analysis before cadoman Feb 2022 #26
Who is surprised by this? LetMyPeopleVote Feb 2022 #12
No sh*t, sherlock. elleng Feb 2022 #13
So, What Was The Impact? DallasNE Feb 2022 #14
I used to deal with a bunch of paperwork madville Feb 2022 #16
This is exactly why Texas changes the law on signature matching. Lonestarblue Feb 2022 #18
This is Jim Crow on steroids! Washington election are exclusively vote by mail Jose Garcia Feb 2022 #19
But if Trump lived there somehow his signature would be readable? Bengus81 Feb 2022 #21
Interesting finding but... CosmicSloth Feb 2022 #22
DITTO that. L. Coyote Feb 2022 #23
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rejected Mail Ballots Are...»Reply #18