Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why waste time on this cultural sh*t when we need decisions on sinkingfeeling Feb 2022 #1
Possibly, justices on the Supreme Court can walk and chew gum at the same time. mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2022 #2
Not this Supreme Court. Laser focused on bringing a sinkingfeeling Feb 2022 #3
This court is not looking to move away from the old days. n/m BradAllison Feb 2022 #5
THIS court will bluestarone Feb 2022 #4
by the same logic azureblue Feb 2022 #6
Doesn't seem like a sound business decision to me. LoisB Feb 2022 #7
It's a slippery slope to Freddie Feb 2022 #8
Who has standing? SomewhereInTheMiddle Feb 2022 #9
then they will refuse mixed race couples... the theocracy of white male only power is close JT45242 Feb 2022 #10
The SC opened this door with the baker's case. It will only get worse if they side with her. Lonestarblue Feb 2022 #11
From Joe.My.God.: mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2022 #12
Nor will she ever have any same sex client couples... Claire Oh Nette Feb 2022 #15
In cases like this where there are lots of options Sapient Donkey Feb 2022 #13
I predict this will be a 9-0 ruling hueymahl Feb 2022 #14
Just like the baker case I'm really having trouble understanding why this is a lawsuit jgmiller Feb 2022 #16
That could perhaps work, if refusing businesses.... moriah Feb 2022 #18
WRONG: It is not true that "any business has the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason." onenote Feb 2022 #19
The Court will rule J_William_Ryan Feb 2022 #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court to decide w...»Reply #5